Sativex® in multiple sclerosis spasticity: a cost-effectiveness model

被引:0
作者
Slof, John [1 ]
Gras, Adrien [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain
[2] GfK Bridgehead, London W1H 7AA, England
关键词
cost-effectiveness; Delphi survey; healthcare costs; Markov model; multiple sclerosis; pharmacoeconomic analysis; Sativex (R); spasticity; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN THERAPY; CANNABIS-BASED MEDICINE; SPINAL SPASTICITY; DELPHI SURVEY; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; SYMPTOMS; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1586/ERP.12.40
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive disease that carries a high socioeconomic burden. Spasticity (rigidity and spasms) is common in MS and a key contributor to MS-related disability. Objectives: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of Sativex (R), a 9-8-tetrahydrocannabinol/cannabidiol-based oromucosal spray that acts as an endocannabinoid system modulator. Sativex was recently approved for the management of resistant MS spasticity as add-on medication. Methods: A Markov model-based analysis was performed over a 5-year horizon from a German and Spanish healthcare payer perspective. The incremental cost of Sativex was low compared with current spasticity treatments, and provided a quality-adjusted life-year gain over the current standard of care. Results: The base-case incremental cost effectiveness ratio for Sativex was estimated at (sic)11,214/quality-adjusted life-year in Germany, while the drug was the dominant option in Spain, providing savings of (sic)3496/patient over a 5-year period (year of costing: 2010). This was seen because the lower severity of spasticity in patients who had improved led to reduced resource consumption (e.g., physiotherapy and medications). Conclusion: Despite having a relatively high acquisition cost, Sativex was shown to be a cost effective treatment option for patients with MS-related spasticity.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 538
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe [J].
Andlin-Sobocki, P ;
Jönsson, B ;
Wittchen, HU ;
Olesen, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 12 :1-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], GUID METH TECHN APPR
[3]  
[Anonymous], UK MHRA SAT REG STUD
[4]  
[Anonymous], MOVE 1 EP STUD DAT F
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SAT OR SPRAY SUMM PR
[6]  
Arroyo R, 2011, EXPERT REV PHARM OUT, V11, P205, DOI [10.1586/erp.11.6, 10.1586/ERP.11.6]
[7]   LONG-TERM INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH INTRACTABLE SPASTICITY [J].
BECKER, WJ ;
HARRIS, CJ ;
LONG, ML ;
ABLETT, DP ;
KLEIN, GM ;
DEFORGE, DA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 22 (03) :208-217
[8]   Cost-effectiveness Modeling of Intrathecal Baclofen Therapy Versus Other Interventions for Disabling Spasticity [J].
Bensmail, D. ;
Ward, A. B. ;
Wissel, J. ;
Motta, F. ;
Saltuari, Leopold ;
Lissens, J. ;
Cros, S. ;
Beresniak, A. .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2009, 23 (06) :546-552
[9]   Principles of pharmacoeconomics and their impact on strategic imperatives of pharmaceutical research and development [J].
Bodrogi, Jozsef ;
Kalo, Zoltan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 159 (07) :1367-1373
[10]  
Bravo Vergel Yolanda, 2008, Pract Neurol, V8, P175, DOI 10.1136/pn.2007.140186