A Partial Review of Seven Official Guidelines for Cost-Benefit Analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Abelson, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Appl Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
additional economic benefits; benefit-cost ratios; marginal excess tax burden; real values; standing; social discount rate; treatment of risk; willingness to accept values;
D O I
10.1017/bca.2020.3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reviews seven contemporary official guidelines to cost-benefit analysis (CBA) with respect to eight major cost-benefit issues drawing on the latest edition of the major CBA textbook for guidance, although not complete authority. The guidelines are those by UK Treasury, European Commission, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, New Zealand Treasury, Infrastructure Australia, NSW State Treasury, and Victorian State Department of Treasury and Finance. The eight major issues discussed are the issue of standing, core valuation principles, the scope of CBA with reference to potential additional economic benefits, changes in real values over time, the marginal excess tax burden, the social discount rate, use of benefit-cost ratios, and treatment of risk. While all the guidelines are quality guides to CBA, the paper finds that there is room for improved discussion and practice at various points in each of these guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 293
页数:22
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Methodological Challenges in Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Voros, Tunde
    PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2018, 63 (03): : 402 - 423
  • [2] Cost-Benefit Analysis as a Failure to Learn from the Past
    Broughel, James
    JOURNAL OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE, 2020, 35 (01): : 105 - 113
  • [3] The standing of foreign lenders in cost-benefit analysis: some implications for environmental appraisals
    Jorge-Calderon, Doramas
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2021, 10 (03) : 261 - 277
  • [4] A Cost and Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Stand More AT Work (SMArT Work) Intervention
    Munir, Fehmidah
    Miller, Paul
    Biddle, Stuart J. H.
    Davies, Melanie J.
    Dunstan, David W.
    Esliger, Dale W.
    Gray, Laura J.
    O'Connell, Sophie E.
    Waheed, Ghazala
    Yates, Thomas
    Edwardson, Charlotte L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (04)
  • [5] Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost-Benefit Analysis:: A methodological proposal
    Saez, Carmen Almansa
    Requena, Javier Calatrava
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 60 (04) : 712 - 725
  • [6] Defining Regional "Standing" for Cost-Benefit Analysis in Federated Countries
    Dobes, Leo
    ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2019, 38 (02): : 156 - 166
  • [7] Cost-benefit analysis and the European Union cohesion fund: On the social cost of capital and labour
    Florio, M
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 40 (02) : 211 - 224
  • [8] Need-based project prioritization: Alternative to cost-benefit analysis
    Kulkarni, RB
    Miller, D
    Ingram, RM
    Wong, CW
    Lorenz, J
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2004, 130 (02): : 150 - 158
  • [9] Cost-benefit model for the construction of tornado shelters
    Whalen, TM
    Gopal, S
    Abraham, DM
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 130 (06) : 772 - 779
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Construction Information Management System Implementation: Case Study
    Vaughan, Joshua L.
    Leming, Michael L.
    Liu, Min
    Jaselskis, Edward
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (04) : 445 - 455