Clinical Usefulness of Estimated Speaking Fundamental Frequency Using the Voice and Speech Range Profiles in Voice Disorders

被引:2
作者
Lee, Seung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jaeock [3 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gangnam Severance Hosp, Inst Logoped & Phoniatr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kangnam Univ, Grad Sch Educ, Div Speech Pathol Educ, Yongin, South Korea
来源
COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD | 2020年 / 25卷 / 02期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Voice disorders; Estimated speaking fundamental frequency (ESF0); Differences in speaking fundamental frequency (Delta SF0); Voice range profile; Speech range profile; LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY; ADULTS; INDEX;
D O I
10.12963/csd.20727
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives:The purpose of the study was to determine whether estimated speaking fundamental frequency (ESF0) using the voice and speech range profiles and differences (Delta SF0(VRP), Delta SF0(SRP), Delta SF0(SUM)) between the ESF0 and the SF0 measured by electroglottography (SF0(EGG)) differ according to the presence of voice disorders and gender. Moreover, correlation between SF0(EGG) and Delta SF0 measures, and between the G of the GRBAS scale and LSF0 measures was explored. Clinical usefulness of Delta SF0 as a screening tool was also explored. Methods: A total of 85 patients with voice disorders and 85 normal adults participated in the study. For each participant SF0(EGG) was measured using a passage-reading task and electroglottography. Maximum/minimum pitch, pitch range in Hz and semitone were measured using the VRP and SRP tasks. ESF0(VRP), ESF0(SRP), Delta SF0(VRP), Delta SF0(S)(RP), and Delta SF0(SUM) were calculated. Results: Significant difference between groups in the ESF0SRP was found only for males. Patient group's Delta SF0 measures were higher than the normal group. Strong positive correlation between the SF0(EGG) and the Delta SF0 measures was found.There was weak positive correlation between the G and Delta SF0 measures. The AUC of the Delta SF0(VRP), Delta SF0(S)(RP), Delta SF0(SUM) was .690, .673, .771, the cutoff score 10.867, 10.347, 17.777, respectively. The AUC of the Delta SF0(SUM )was higher than those of the Delta SF0(VRP) and Delta SF0sRp. Conclusion: Results indicated that the Delta SF0 showed potential as an objective index for screening voice disorders, especially for those characterized by pitch change. The Delta SF0 could enhance the clinical usefulness of the VRP and SRP.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 488
页数:9
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Exploring the Relationship Between Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)
    Awan, Shaheen N.
    Roy, Nelson
    Cohen, Seth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2014, 28 (04) : 430 - 439
  • [2] Berg M., 2017, J VOICE, V31, DOI 10.12963/csd.20727tosociodemographic and lifestyle factors
  • [3] D'Alatri L, 2014, ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGO, V34, P253
  • [4] Hirano M., 1981, CLIN EXAMINATION VOI, V5, P1
  • [5] Development and Validation of a Novel Simplified Voice Range Profile Measurement Method: Comparison of Maximum Vocal Performance Based on the VRP Protocol
    Jung, Won Jung
    Choi, Seong Hee
    Choi, Chul-Hee
    [J]. COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2019, 24 (03): : 770 - 784
  • [6] Kim H., 2012, Neurologic speech -language disorders
  • [7] Juxta-articular Plate Fixation in Distal Radius Intra-articular Fractures with Accompanying Volar Free Fragments beyond the Watershed Line
    Lee, Jun-Ku
    Lee, Soo-Hyun
    Sim, Young-Suk
    Kim, Tae-Ho
    Baek, Eugene
    Han, Soo-Hong
    [J]. CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (02) : 135 - 141
  • [8] 김재옥, 2019, [Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 말소리와 음성과학], V11, P77, DOI 10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.3.077
  • [9] 이승진, 2019, [Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 말소리와 음성과학], V11, P49
  • [10] Korean Version of the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (K-VAPP): A Validation Study
    Lee, Seung Jin
    Choi, Hong-Shik
    Kim, HyangHee
    Byeon, Hyung Kwon
    Lim, Sung-Eun
    Yang, Min Kyo
    [J]. COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2016, 21 (04): : 695 - 708