Learning from Collaborative Research in Water Management Practice

被引:20
作者
Raadgever, G. T. [1 ]
Mostert, E. [2 ]
van de Giesen, N. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Grontmij Nederland, Team Coastal & Rivers, Hydraul Construct Dept, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Water Resources Management Grp, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Cognitive learning; Collaborative research; Modeling; Flood management; Groundwater management; Q methodology; SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL-SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; FRAMEWORK; MODELS; ORGANIZATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-012-0070-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In order to deal with complex water management problems, it is increasingly claimed that researchers should collaborate with authorities and other stakeholders. According to the literature, such collaboration can enhance cognitive learning about the issues at stake, but there is little empirical evidence for this. In this paper, we assess whether collaborative research leads to more cognitive learning, and which factors may influence this. We first develop a structured methodology for assessing cognitive learning and identifying potential factors. Next, we apply this methodology in a case study on groundwater management in Delft (The Netherlands) and one on long-term flood management in the Lower Rhine area (Germany and The Netherlands). Contrary to some of the literature, our findings indicate that only intensive collaboration enhances cognitive learning. Therefore, we recommend organizing collaborative research only when all intended participants are sufficiently motivated to collaborate and learn. For these cases, we recommend to organise 1) many meetings, 2) intensive discussion of perspectives, 3) active participation in the research, and 4) an equal input in and influence on the research process by all involved actors.
引用
收藏
页码:3251 / 3266
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Argyris C, 2004, DOUBLE LOOP LEARNING
[2]   THE LESSONS OF LEARNING - RECONCILING THEORIES OF POLICY LEARNING AND POLICY CHANGE [J].
BENNETT, CJ ;
HOWLETT, M .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1992, 25 (03) :275-294
[3]  
Beratan KK, 2007, ECOL SOC, V12
[4]   Research utilization - Bridging a cultural gap between communities [J].
Beyer, JM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 1997, 6 (01) :17-22
[5]  
Boonstra JJ, 2004, INTRO DYNAMICS ORG C
[6]   Exploring the gap between water managers and researchers: Difficulties of model-based tools to support practical water management [J].
Borowski, Ilke ;
Hare, Matt .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (07) :1049-1074
[7]  
Brown S., 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
[8]   Uncertainty matters: Computer models at the science-policy interface [J].
Brugnach, Marcela ;
Tagg, Andrew ;
Keil, Florian ;
de Lange, Wim J. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (07) :1075-1090
[9]   Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy [J].
Busenberg, GJ .
POLICY SCIENCES, 1999, 32 (01) :1-11
[10]  
Carton L.J., 2007, Map making and map use in a multi-actor context: Spatial visualizations and frame conflicts in regional policymaking in the Netherlands