Prenatal diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus by culture and polymerase chain reaction:: 98 pregnancies leading to congenital infection

被引:0
作者
Bodéus, M
Hubinont, C
Bernard, P
Bouckaert, A
Thomas, K
Goubau, P
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Microbiol, Virol Unit, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Obstet, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Inst Stat, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
HCMV; PCR; pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199904)19:4<314::AID-PD542>3.0.CO;2-H
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is the most common cause of viral intra-uterine infection. The experience with prenatal diagnosis remains limited and is based on few reports of small numbers of cases. It is thus difficult to compare the accuracy of the different tests because the groups studied were small and heterogeneous. We describe here our experience on a series of 98 pregnancies leading to HCMV congenital infection, among which 71 have been tested by amniotic fluid (AF) sampling followed by culture and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Independently of the delay between AF sampling and the first HCMV IgM positive result, the mean sensitivity of both culture and PCR was around 70 per cent. The best sensitivity (95.5 per cent) was obtained after a delay greater than or equal to 6 weeks in late pregnancy (greater than or equal to 23 weeks). The present study demonstrated clearly that the delay between AF puncture and the presumed date of seroconversion is more important for sensitivity than the technique used for the diagnosis (PCR or culture). However, even in the best diagnostic conditions, negative results of HCMV culture or PCR in AF cannot formally exclude intra-uterine infection. Copyright (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 317
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION - FALSE-NEGATIVE AMNIOCENTESIS AT 20 WEEKS GESTATION [J].
CATANZARITE, V ;
DANKNER, WM .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 13 (11) :1021-1025
[2]   INFECTIOUS-DISEASES SOCIETY OF AMERICA AND CENTERS FOR DISEASE-CONTROL - SUMMARY OF A WORKSHOP ON SURVEILLANCE FOR CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE [J].
DEMMLER, GJ .
REVIEWS OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1991, 13 (02) :315-329
[3]   ACCURACY OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID TESTING BEFORE 21 WEEKS GESTATION IN PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION [J].
DONNER, C ;
LIESNARD, C ;
BRANCART, F ;
RODESCH, F .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1994, 14 (11) :1055-1059
[4]  
DONNER C, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P481
[5]   A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PRIMARY CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION DURING PREGNANCY - FINAL REPORT [J].
GRIFFITHS, PD ;
BABOONIAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1984, 91 (04) :307-315
[6]   Congenital cytomegalovirus infection: A long-standing problem still seeking a solution [J].
Hagay, ZJ ;
Biran, G ;
Ornoy, A ;
Reece, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (01) :241-245
[7]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS (CMV) INFECTION - A PRELIMINARY-REPORT [J].
HOGGE, WA ;
BUFFONE, GJ ;
HOGGE, JS .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1993, 13 (02) :131-136
[8]  
HOHLFELD P, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P615
[9]   SURVEILLANCE FOR CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE - A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL-CONGENITAL-CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-DISEASE-REGISTRY [J].
ISTAS, AS ;
DEMMLER, GJ ;
DOBBINS, JG ;
STEWART, JA ;
ADLER, S ;
BALE, JF ;
MURPH, J ;
BRADY, MT ;
CHERNESKY, MA ;
CHONMAITREE, T ;
COEN, RW ;
COURTNEY, J ;
DANKNER, WM ;
FORDJONES, EL ;
GARCIA, J ;
ATKINS, JT ;
GEHRZ, R ;
GIVNER, L ;
GRUBER, WC ;
KENNY, JF ;
KEYSERLING, HL ;
KINNEY, JS ;
KOVACS, A ;
KUMAR, ML ;
LEACH, CT ;
MARSHALL, GS ;
RABALAIS, G ;
MONTGOMERY, JR ;
MURPHY, D ;
PATAMASUCON, P ;
NEWPORT, MT ;
PASS, R ;
BOPPANA, SB ;
SHELTON, M ;
SOKOL, D ;
STAMOS, JK ;
ROWLEY, AH ;
STARR, S ;
WEINER, LB ;
GROSS, J ;
HUTTO, C ;
RUPAR, DG .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1995, 20 (03) :665-670
[10]   PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION [J].
LAMY, ME ;
MULONGO, KN ;
GADISSEUX, JF ;
LYON, G ;
GAUDY, V ;
VANLIERDE, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (01) :91-94