Lamellar Dissection Technique for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation

被引:11
|
作者
Tan, Tien-En [1 ,2 ]
Devarajan, Kavya [2 ]
Seah, Xin-Yi [2 ]
Lin, Shu-Jun [2 ]
Lim, Gary Swee [2 ]
Cajucom-Uy, Howard Yu [3 ]
Ang, Marcus Han Nian [1 ,2 ]
Tan, Donald Tiang Hwee [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, 11 Third Hosp Ave, Singapore 168751, Singapore
[2] Academia, Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Singapore Eye Bank, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Camden Med Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
DMEK; graft preparation; surgical technique; endothelial cell loss; calcein AM staining; EYE BANK PREPARATION; CELL LOSS; PREPARATION FAILURE; TISSUE-PREPARATION; DMEK GRAFTS; RISK; QUANTIFICATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000002090
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To describe a novel lamellar dissection technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation, and to evaluate the rate of endothelial cell loss (ECL) and graft preparation failure associated with this technique. Methods: We conducted an ex vivo laboratory-based study comparing ECL between the lamellar dissection and peeling techniques. Eight pairs of human donor corneas underwent calcein acetoxymethyl staining-all right eyes underwent the peeling technique and all left eyes underwent the lamellar dissection technique. ECL was quantified by image analysis with trainable segmentation software and compared between groups. We also conducted a retrospective analysis of 161 consecutive DMEK graft preparations by a single surgeon using the lamellar dissection technique from 2010 to 2018. Data on donor characteristics and graft preparation failures were obtained. Results: Baseline donor characteristics were comparable in both arms of the laboratory-based study. Mean (SD) ECL with the lamellar dissection and peeling techniques was 13.8% (4.2%) and 11.2% (6.1%), respectively. There was no significant difference between the two (P = 0.327). In the clinical series, there were 2 graft preparation failures in 161 cases (1.2%). Among cases performed on diabetic donor tissue, the rate of graft preparation failure was 4.7%. Conclusions: The lamellar dissection technique has a similar rate of ECL compared with the peeling technique for DMEK graft preparation. This technique also has a low rate of graft preparation failure and may be a useful technique for diabetic donor tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reproducibility of Graft Preparations in Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Schloetzer-Schrehardt, Ursula
    Bachmann, Bjoern O.
    Tourtas, Theofilos
    Cursiefen, Claus
    Zenkel, Matthias
    Roessler, Kathrin
    Kruse, Friedrich E.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (09) : 1769 - 1777
  • [42] Intraocular Graft Unfolding Techniques in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Liarakos, Vasilios S.
    Dapena, Isabel
    Ham, Lisanne
    van Dijk, Korine
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 131 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [43] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Using the Liquid Bubble Technique with Subtrabecular Hydrodissection: A Retrospective Real-Life Study
    Blavakis, Emmanouil
    Kecik, Mateusz
    Panos, Georgios D.
    Thumann, Gabriele
    Massa, Horace
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (20)
  • [44] Where is endothelial keratoplasty going: from Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty to Descemet membrane endothelial transfer?
    Tong, C. Maya
    Melles, Gerrit R. J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2012, 47 (03): : 197 - 199
  • [45] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty After Penetrating Keratoplasty: Features for Success
    Einan-Lifshitz, Adi
    Belkin, Avner
    Sorkin, Nir
    Mednick, Zale
    Boutin, Tanguy
    Gill, Ishrat
    Karimi, Mohammad
    Chan, Clara C.
    Rootman, David S.
    CORNEA, 2018, 37 (09) : 1093 - 1097
  • [46] Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Luft, N.
    Dirisamer, M.
    Priglinger, S.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2017, 234 (03) : 354 - 364
  • [47] Comparison of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in the Treatment of Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty
    Einan-Lifshitz, Adi
    Mednick, Zale
    Belkin, Avner
    Sorkin, Nir
    Alshaker, Sara
    Boutin, Tanguy
    Chan, Clara C.
    Rootman, David S.
    CORNEA, 2019, 38 (09) : 1077 - 1082
  • [48] A Novel Technique for Donor Insertion and Unfolding in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Fogla, Rajesh
    Thazethaeveetil, Indumathy Ramachandran
    CORNEA, 2021, 40 (08) : 1073 - 1078
  • [49] Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Leon, Pia
    Parekh, Mohit
    Nahum, Yoav
    Mimouni, Michael
    Giannaccare, Giuseppe
    Sapigni, Laura
    Ruzza, Alessandro
    Busin, Massimo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 187 : 117 - 124
  • [50] Rebubbling and graft detachment in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty using a standardised protocol
    Fu, Lanxing
    Hollick, Emma J.
    EYE, 2023, 37 (12) : 2494 - 2498