Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues

被引:34
作者
Graham, John D. [1 ]
Rupp, John A. [1 ]
Schenk, Olga [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Fracking; induced seismicity; public opinion; risk perception; unconventional gas development; water contamination; SHALE GAS; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; PERCEIVED RISK; NOXIOUS FACILITIES; OIL; COMPENSATION; OKLAHOMA; PENNSYLVANIA; INJECTION; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12512
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Unconventional gas development (UGD) is growing rapidly in the United States. Drawing on insights from risk perception and risk governance theories and recent public opinion surveys, we find that UGD is an emerging technology that is likely to be perceived as risky, even though objective risk assessments suggest that risks are low and controllable through best risk management practices. Perceived risk varies significantly depending on the state and locality but perceptions of risk appear to be increasing as the technology is used more widely in the United States and as organized opponents of the technology intensify their efforts. Risk perceptions are attenuated somewhat because of the perceived benefits of UGD and compensation schemes for individuals and communities. The types of triggering events necessary for large-scale social amplification and stigmatization have not yet occurred but awareness of UGD is growing and organized opposition has been sufficient to cause prohibitions of UGD in some U.S. states and localities. Additional directions for social science research on public reactions to UGD are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:1770 / 1788
页数:19
相关论文
共 161 条
  • [31] Cameron David, 2015, WASHINGTON POST
  • [32] Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development
    Caulton, Dana R.
    Shepson, Paul B.
    Santoro, Renee L.
    Sparks, Jed P.
    Howarth, Robert W.
    Ingraffea, Anthony R.
    Cambaliza, Maria O. L.
    Sweeney, Colm
    Karion, Anna
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    Stirm, Brian H.
    Montzka, Stephen A.
    Miller, Ben R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (17) : 6237 - 6242
  • [33] Economics and Politics of Shale Gas in Europe
    Chyong, Chi Kong
    Reiner, David M.
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2015, 4 (01) : 69 - 83
  • [34] Cvetkovich G.T., 1999, SOCIAL TRUST MANAGEM
  • [35] Energy Abundance or Environmental Worries? Analyzing Public Support for Fracking in the United States
    Davis, Charles
    Fisk, Jonathan M.
    [J]. REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH, 2014, 31 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [36] Douglas Mary., 1982, Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers
  • [37] Eaton L, 2014, WALL STREET J
  • [38] Efstathiou Jim., 2012, Bloomberg
  • [39] Egan Patrick J., 2013, PARTISAN PRIORITIES
  • [40] Injection-Induced Earthquakes
    Ellsworth, William L.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6142) : 142 - +