Students' dilemmas in reaction stoichiometry problem solving: deducing the limiting reagent in chemical reactions

被引:19
作者
Chandrasegaran, A. L. [1 ]
Treagust, David F. [1 ]
Waldrip, Bruce G. [2 ]
Chandrasegaran, Antonia [3 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Sci & Math Educ Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ So Queensland, Fac Educ, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
limiting reagent; stoichiometry problem solving; reasoning strategies; think-aloud protocols; retrospective verbalisations; MOLE-CONCEPT; DIFFICULTIES; CONCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1039/b901456j
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A qualitative case study was conducted to investigate the understanding of the limiting reagent concept and the strategies used by five Year 11 students when solving four reaction stoichiometry problems. Students' written problem-solving strategies were studied using the think-aloud protocol during problem-solving, and retrospective verbalisations after each activity. Contrary to several findings reported in the research literature, the two high-achieving students in the study tended to rely on the use of a memorised formula to deduce the limiting reagent, by comparing the actual mole ratio of the reactants with the stoichiometric mole ratio. The other three average-achieving students, however, generally deduced the limiting reagent from first principles, using the stoichiometry of the balanced chemical equation. Overall, the students displayed limited confidence during problem-solving to determine the limiting reagent and to perform related computations.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 23
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, CHEM ED RES BASED PR
  • [2] [Anonymous], SCI TEACHER
  • [3] Ben-Zvi R., 1987, Education in Chemistry, V24, P117
  • [4] Bodner G M., 2002, Chemical education: Towards research-based practice p, P235
  • [5] BouJaoude S., 2000, SCH SCI REV, V81, P91
  • [6] THINK-ALOUD METHODS IN CHEMISTRY EDUCATION - UNDERSTANDING STUDENT THINKING
    BOWEN, CW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1994, 71 (03) : 184 - 190
  • [7] Bucat B., 1995, Selected papers in chemical education research
  • [8] BURTON G, 1994, SALTERS ADV CHEM CHE
  • [9] Concept learning versus problem solving: a cognitive difference
    Cracolice, Mark S.
    Deming, John C.
    Ehlert, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 85 (06) : 873 - 878
  • [10] Dahsah C., 2007, Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, V6, P573, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10763-007-9072-0