Application of distributed hydrological models for predictions in ungauged basins: a method to quantify predictive uncertainty

被引:39
作者
Cibin, R. [1 ]
Athira, P. [2 ]
Sudheer, K. P. [2 ]
Chaubey, I. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Madras 600036, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Purdue Univ, Dept Earth Atmospher & Planetary Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
predictions in ungauged basin; predictive uncertainty; distributed hydrologic model; SWAT model; FORMAL BAYESIAN METHOD; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; GLUE; SENSITIVITY; CALIBRATION; FLOW; REGIONALIZATION; IDENTIFICATION; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.9721
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Stream flow predictions in ungauged basins are one of the most challenging tasks in surface water hydrology because of nonavailability of data and system heterogeneity. This study proposes a method to quantify stream flow predictive uncertainty of distributed hydrologic models for ungauged basins. The method is based on the concepts of deriving probability distribution of model's sensitive parameters by using measured data from a gauged basin and transferring the distribution to hydrologically similar ungauged basins for stream flow predictions. A Monte Carlo simulation of the hydrologic model using sampled parameter sets with assumed probability distribution is conducted. The posterior probability distributions of the sensitive parameters are then computed using a Bayesian approach. In addition, preselected threshold values of likelihood measure of simulations are employed for sizing the parameter range, which helps reduce the predictive uncertainty. The proposed method is illustrated through two case studies using two hydrologically independent sub-basins in the Cedar Creek watershed located in Texas, USA, using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The probability distribution of the SWAT parameters is derived from the data from one of the sub-basins and is applied for simulation in the other sub-basin considered as pseudo-ungauged. In order to assess the robustness of the method, the numerical exercise is repeated by reversing the gauged and pseudo-ungauged basins. The results are subsequently compared with the measured stream flow from the sub-basins. It is observed that the measured stream flow in the pseudo-ungauged basin lies well within the estimated confidence band of predicted stream flow. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2033 / 2045
页数:13
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Montanari A, 2007, WATER RESOURCES RES, V43
  • [32] Neitsch S.L., 2002, GSWRL Report 02-01, BRC Report 02-05
  • [33] On the use of spatial regularization strategies to improve calibration of distributed watershed models
    Pokhrel, Prafulla
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [34] An improved methodology for predicting the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments
    Post, DA
    Jones, JA
    Grant, GE
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 1998, 13 (3-4) : 395 - 403
  • [35] Understanding predictive uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: The challenge of identifying input and structural errors
    Renard, Benjamin
    Kavetski, Dmitri
    Kuczera, George
    Thyer, Mark
    Franks, Stewart W.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [36] Streamflow prediction in ungauged catchments using copula-based dissimilarity measures
    Samaniego, Luis
    Bardossy, Andras
    Kumar, Rohini
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [37] A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors
    Schoups, Gerrit
    Vrugt, Jasper A.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [38] Singh V.P., 2002, MATH MODELS LARGE WA, P891
  • [39] IAHS decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 2003-2012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences
    Sivapalan, M
    Takeuchi, K
    Franks, SW
    Gupta, VK
    Karambiri, H
    Lakshmi, V
    Liang, X
    McDonnell, JJ
    Mendiondo, EM
    O'Connell, PE
    Oki, T
    Pomeroy, JW
    Schertzer, D
    Uhlenbrook, S
    Zehe, E
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL-JOURNAL DES SCIENCES HYDROLOGIQUES, 2003, 48 (06): : 857 - 880
  • [40] Sobol I. M., 1993, MATH MODEL COMPUT EX, V4, P407