Towards an ethics safe harbor for global biomedical research

被引:17
作者
Dove, Edward S. [1 ]
Knoppers, Bartha M. [1 ]
Zawati, Ma'n H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF LAW AND THE BIOSCIENCES | 2014年 / 1卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
biomedical research; ethics; genomics; governance; harmonization; safe harbor; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION; COMMITTEE; BOARD; GOVERNANCE; GENOMICS; SCIENCE; CONSENT; REFORM; IMPACT; HARMONIZATION;
D O I
10.1093/jlb/lst002
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Although increasingly global, data-driven genomics and other 'omics'-focused research hold great promise for health discoveries, current research ethics review systems around the world challenge potential improvements in human health from such research. To overcome this challenge, we propose a 'Safe Harbor Framework for International Ethics Equivalency' that facilitates the harmonization of ethics review of specific types of data-driven international research projects while respecting globally transposable research ethics norms and principles. The Safe Harbor would consist in part of an agency supporting an International Federation for Ethics Review (IFER), formed by a voluntary compact among countries, granting agencies, philanthropies, institutions, and healthcare, patient advocacy, and research organizations. IFER would be both a central ethics review body, and also a forum for review and follow-up of policies concerning ethics norms for international research projects. It would be built on five principle elements: (1) registration, (2) compliance review, (3) recognition, (4) monitoring and enforcement, and (5) public participation. The SafeHarbor would create many benefits for researchers, countries, and the general public, and may eventually have application beyond (gen)omics to other areas of biomedical research that increasingly engage in secondary use of data and present only negligible risks.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 51
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Ethics of Biomedical Big Data
    Mason, Paul H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2017, 14 (04) : 571 - 574
  • [32] Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers' Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research
    Parker, Michael
    Kingori, Patricia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [33] Ethics Review of Biomedical Research in Uzbekistan: Policy and Program Gaps
    Aniyozova, Dilfuza
    Strosberg, Martin A.
    [J]. ASIAN BIOETHICS REVIEW, 2024, 16 (04) : 653 - 661
  • [34] Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups
    Rushforth, Alexander
    Franssen, Thomas
    de Rijcke, Sarah
    [J]. SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2019, 44 (02) : 209 - 236
  • [35] Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE)
    Soehartono, A. M.
    Yu, L. G.
    Khor, K. A.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2022, 127 (12) : 7487 - 7497
  • [36] Assessing the consequences of decentralizing biomedical research
    Bot, Brian M.
    Wilbanks, John T.
    Mangravite, Lara M.
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [37] Towards Achieving Trust Through Transparency and Ethics
    Kwan, David
    Cysneiros, Luiz Marcio
    Sampaio do Prado Leite, Julio Cesar
    [J]. 29TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (RE 2021), 2021, : 82 - 93
  • [38] RIGHTS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH: A PROPOSAL TOWARDS NEW CONSONANCES
    Casonato, Carlo
    Tomasi, Marta
    [J]. BIOLAW JOURNAL-RIVISTA DI BIODIRITTO, 2019, (01): : 343 - 358
  • [39] Ethics in biomedical scientific publication. A review of the publications retracted in Spain
    Marco-Cuenca, Gonzalo
    Antonio Salvador-Olivan, Jose
    Arquero-Aviles, Rosario
    [J]. PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2019, 28 (02):
  • [40] Towards a politics of collaborative worldmaking: ethics, epistemologies and mutual positionalities in conflict research
    Vogel, Christoph
    Musamba, Josaphat
    [J]. ETHNOGRAPHY, 2022,