Modeling hydrological ecosystem services and tradeoffs: a case study in Baiyangdian watershed, China

被引:55
|
作者
Bai, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Hua [1 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
Zhuang, Changwei [3 ]
Jiang, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Acad Environm Sci, Inst Appl Ecol, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Environm Protect, Nanjing Inst Environm Sci, Nanjing 210042, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Tradeoffs; Scenarios; InVEST; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s12665-012-2154-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Policy makers and scientists consider that land use strategies are designed to provide direct benefits to people by protecting vital ecosystem services. However, due to lack of information and evaluation methods, there is no effective and systematic tool for assessing tradeoffs between direct human benefits and ecosystem services. Land use changes influence ecosystem properties, processes and components, which are the basis for providing services. Five alternative land use scenarios (no conversion of agricultural lands, no urban expansion, agricultural expansion, forestry expansion, and riparian reforestation) were modeled for the Baiyangdian watershed, China, a densely populated, highly modified watershed with serious water shortage and pollution problems. The model InVEST (Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs) is designed to inform decisions about natural resource management, with an aim to align economic forces with conservation. Three ecosystem services (agricultural production, hydropower production, and water quality) were modeled to balance direct benefits and hydrological ecosystem services using InVEST. The results showed that: hydropower production was the greatest in the forestry expansion, but the lowest in agricultural expansion; agricultural production was reduced the most in forestry expansion, while retained the most in riparian reforestation. Riparian reforestation also provided the highest N and P retention and lowest N and P exportation. Riparian reforestation was the optimal land use strategy, since it protected and enhanced the vital ecosystem services without undermining direct human benefits. This research presents an initial analytical framework for integrating direct human benefits and ecosystem services in policy planning and illustrates its application. Although there are important potential tradeoffs between ecosystem services, this systematic planning framework offers a means for identifying valuable synergies between conservation and development.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 718
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing hydrological and provisioning ecosystem services in a case study in Western Central Brazil
    Koschke L.
    Lorz C.
    Fürst C.
    Lehmann T.
    Makeschin F.
    Koschke, L. (lars.koschke@tu-dresden.de), 1600, Springer Verlag (03) : 1 - 15
  • [22] Local Residents' Perceptions for Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Fenghe River Watershed
    Zhang, Hongjuan
    Pang, Qian
    Long, Huan
    Zhu, Haochen
    Gao, Xin
    Li, Xiuqing
    Jiang, Xiaohui
    Liu, Kang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (19)
  • [23] Bayesian uncertainty analysis in hydrological modeling associated with watershed subdivision level: a case study of SLURP model applied to the Xiangxi River watershed, China
    Jing-Cheng Han
    Guo-He Huang
    Hua Zhang
    Zhong Li
    Yong-Ping Li
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28 : 973 - 989
  • [24] Bayesian uncertainty analysis in hydrological modeling associated with watershed subdivision level: a case study of SLURP model applied to the Xiangxi River watershed, China
    Han, Jing-Cheng
    Huang, Guo-He
    Zhang, Hua
    Li, Zhong
    Li, Yong-Ping
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2014, 28 (04) : 973 - 989
  • [25] Spatial -temporal variation and tradeoffs/synergies analysis on multiple ecosystem services: A case study in the Three -River Headwaters region of China
    Zheng, Defeng
    Wang, Yanhui
    Hao, Shuai
    Xu, Wenjing
    Lv, Leting
    Yu, Shuai
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 116
  • [26] Understanding scale effects and differentiation mechanisms of ecosystem services tradeoffs and synergies relationship: A case study of the Lishui River Basin, China
    Zeng, Suping
    Jiang, Chunqian
    Bai, Yanfeng
    Wang, Hui
    Liu, En
    Guo, Lina
    Chen, Shiyou
    Zhang, Jie
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 167
  • [27] Hydrological Modeling of the Jiaoyi Watershed (China) Using HSPF Model
    Yan, Chang-An
    Zhang, Wanchang
    Zhang, Zhijie
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [28] Application of a SWAT Model for Hydrological Modeling in the Xixian Watershed, China
    Shi, Peng
    Hou, Yuanbing
    Xie, Yongyu
    Chen, Chao
    Chen, Xi
    Li, Qiongfang
    Qu, Simin
    Fang, Xiuqin
    Srinivasan, Ragahavan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 18 (11) : 1522 - 1529
  • [29] Valuing the effects of hydropower development on watershed ecosystem services: Case studies in the Jiulong River Watershed, Fujian Province, China
    Wang, Guihua
    Fang, Qinhua
    Zhang, Luoping
    Chen, Weiqi
    Chen, Zhenming
    Hong, Huasheng
    ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2010, 86 (03) : 363 - 368
  • [30] Integrating social-ecological system into watershed ecosystem services management: A case study of the Jialing River Basin, China
    Wang, Yixu
    Gong, Jie
    Zhu, Yuehua
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 160