Selecting Household Water Treatment Options on the Basis of World Health Organization Performance Testing Protocols

被引:14
作者
Bivins, Aaron [1 ]
Beetsch, Nikki [2 ,3 ]
Majuru, Batsirai [2 ]
Montgomery, Maggie [2 ]
Sumner, Trent [1 ]
Brown, Joe [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] WHO, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[3] NSF Int, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; SAFE DRINKING-WATER; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINED USE; DISEASE; BURDEN; IMPACT; POOR;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.8b05682
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The World Health Organization's International Scheme to Evaluate Household Water Treatment Technologies serves to benchmark microbiological performance of existing and novel technologies and processes for small-scale drinking water treatment according to a tiered system. There is widespread uncertainty around which tiers of performance are most appropriate for technology selection and recommendation in humanitarian response or for routine safe water programming. We used quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) to evaluate attributable reductions in diarrheal disease burden associated with water treatment technologies meeting the three tiers of performance under this Scheme, across a range of conditions. According to mean estimates and under most modeling conditions, potential health gains attributable to microbiologically improved drinking water are realized at the middle tier of performance: "comprehensive protection: high pathogen removal (star star)" for each reference pathogen. The highest tier of performance may yield additional marginal health gains where untreated water is especially contaminated and where adherence is 100%. Our results highlight that health gains from improved efficacy of household water treatment technology remain marginal when adherence is less than 90%. While selection of water treatment technologies that meet minimum WHO efficacy recommendations for comprehensive protection against waterborne pathogens is critical, additional criteria for technology choice and recommendation should focus on potential for correct, consistent, and sustained use.
引用
收藏
页码:5043 / 5051
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   End-User Preferences for and Performance of Competing POU Water Treatment Technologies among the Rural Poor of Kenya [J].
Albert, Jeff ;
Luoto, Jill ;
Levine, David .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (12) :4426-4432
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, PROGR DRINKING WATER
[3]  
[Anonymous], GLOBAL WATER PATHOGE
[4]  
[Anonymous], WATERBORNE PATHOGENS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, RES ROUND I WHO INT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, TROP MED INT HEALTH, DOI DOI 10.1111/TMI.12329
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: Application for Water Safety Management
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GLOBAL WATER PATHOGE, DOI DOI 10.14321/WATERPATHOGENS.23
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EVALUATING HOUSEHOLD
[10]   Optimal Recall Period for Caregiver-reported Illness in Risk Factor and Intervention Studies: A Multicountry Study [J].
Arnold, Benjamin F. ;
Galiani, Sebastian ;
Ram, Pavani K. ;
Hubbard, Alan E. ;
Briceno, Bertha ;
Gertler, Paul J. ;
Colford, John M., Jr. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 177 (04) :361-370