Patient-to-patient variation of susceptibility-induced B0 field in bilateral breast MRI

被引:12
|
作者
Lee, Seung-Kyun [1 ]
Hancu, Ileana [1 ]
机构
[1] GE Global Res, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
B0; mapping; susceptibility; breast shimming; INHOMOGENEITY; TESLA;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.23715
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate intersubject variability of susceptibility-induced static field inhomogeneity in breast and to assess effectiveness of whole-body high-order shimming applied to bilateral breast. Materials and Methods: A fast, computationally efficient method to calculate susceptibility-induced static field from anatomical images was developed. The method was validated against the conventional multiecho B0 mapping method and was used to generate data for linear and higher-order shim simulation on 13 volunteers. Results: Most volunteers showed a significant anteriorposterior B0 gradient. The majority of the subjects also exhibited a statistically significant leftright gradient. The second- and third-order shimming provided only minor (<5% each) improvement in B0 homogeneity. Conclusion: The shape of the airtissue boundary determines most of the observed B0 distribution in bilateral breast. Despite significant variability among subjects, a common feature traceable to generic anatomy exists in the linear gradient. Nonlinear variation of susceptibility-induced B0 field occurs over a relatively short length scale and is likely best shimmed by slice-dependent or localized shimming. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:873880. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 880
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Subject-specific models of susceptibility-induced B0 field variations in breast MRI
    Jordan, Caroline D.
    Daniel, Bruce L.
    Koch, Kevin M.
    Yu, Huanzhou
    Conolly, Steve
    Hargreaves, Brian A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (01) : 227 - 232
  • [2] Magnetic susceptibility as a B0 field strength independent MRI biomarker of liver iron overload
    Hernando, Diego
    Cook, Rachel J.
    Diamond, Carol
    Reeder, Scott B.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2013, 70 (03) : 648 - 656
  • [3] Effect of head motion on MRI B0 field distribution
    Liu, Jiaen
    de Zwart, Jacco A.
    van Gelderen, Peter
    Murphy-Boesch, Joseph
    Duyn, Jeff H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 80 (06) : 2538 - 2548
  • [4] In vivo B0 field shimming methods for MRI at 7 T
    Stockmann, Jason P.
    Wald, Lawrence L.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 71 - 87
  • [5] B0 field homogeneity recommendations, specifications, and measurement units for MRI in radiation therapy
    Gach, H. Michael
    Curcuru, Austen N.
    Mutic, Sasa
    Kim, Taeho
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (09) : 4101 - 4114
  • [6] Spatiotemporal characterization of breathing-induced B0 field fluctuations in the cervical spinal cord at 7T
    Vannesjo, S. Johanna
    Miller, Karla L.
    Clare, Stuart
    Tracey, Irene
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 167 : 191 - 202
  • [7] Image distortion correction for MRI in low field permanent magnet systems with strong B0 inhomogeneity and gradient field nonlinearities
    Kirsten Koolstra
    Thomas O’Reilly
    Peter Börnert
    Andrew Webb
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2021, 34 : 631 - 642
  • [8] Super resolution estimation of B0 field map of brain MRI using model-based methods employing intrinsic priors
    Wang, Jia
    Luo, Jie
    2022 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL AND BIOINFORMATICS ENGINEERING, ICBBE 2022, 2022, : 61 - 67
  • [9] Image distortion correction for MRI in low field permanent magnet systems with strong B0 inhomogeneity and gradient field nonlinearities
    Koolstra, Kirsten
    O'Reilly, Thomas
    Bornert, Peter
    Webb, Andrew
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (04) : 631 - 642
  • [10] Measurement and correction of respiration-induced B0 variations in breast 1H MRS at 4 tesla
    Bolan, PJ
    Henry, PG
    Baker, EH
    Meisamy, S
    Garwood, M
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 52 (06) : 1239 - 1245