Quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:40
作者
Pei, X-Q [1 ]
Liu, L-Z [1 ]
Xiong, Y-H [1 ]
Zou, R-H [1 ]
Chen, M-S [2 ]
Li, A-H [1 ]
Cai, M-Y [3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, State Key Lab Oncol S China, Dept Ultrasound, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, State Key Lab Oncol S China, Dept Hepatobiliary Oncol, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Canc, State Key Lab Oncol S China, Dept Pathol, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
LIVER-LESIONS; ULTRASOUND; US; SONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20120536
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the potential of quantitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: 34 cases of FNH and 66 cases of HCC (all lesions <5 cm) were studied using CEUS to evaluate enhancement patterns and using analytic software Sonoliver (R) (Image-Arena (TM) v.4.0, TomTec Imaging Systems, Munich, Germany) to obtain quantitative features of CEUS in the region of interest. The quantitative features of maximum of intensity (IMAX), rise slope (RS), rise time (RT) and time to peak (TTP) were compared between the two groups and applied to further characterise both FNH and HCC with hypoenhancing patterns in the late phase on CEUS. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for diagnosis of FNH were 67.6% and 93.9%, respectively. For quantitative analysis, IMAX and RS in FNHs were significantly higher than those in HCCs (p<0.05), while RT and TTP in FNHs were significantly shorter (p<0.05). Both the 11 FNHs and 62 HCCs with hypo-enhancing patterns in the late phase were further characterised with their quantitative features, and the sensitivity and specificity of IMAX for diagnosis of FNH were 90.9% and 43.5%, RS 81.8% and 80.6%, RT 90.9% and 71.0%, and TTP 90.9% and 71.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The quantitative features of CEUS in FNH and HCC were significantly different, and they could further differentiate FNH from HCC following conventional CEUS. Advances in knowledge: Our findings suggest that quantitative analysis of CEUS can improve the accuracy of differentiating FNH from HCC.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography [J].
Catala, V. ;
Nicolau, C. ;
Vilana, R. ;
Pages, M. ;
Bianchi, L. ;
Sanchez, M. ;
Bru, C. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) :1066-1073
[2]   GUIDELINES AND GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONTRAST ENHANCED ULTRASOUND (CEUS) IN THE LIVER - UPDATE 2012 A WFUMB-EFSUMB INITIATIVE IN COOPERATION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS AND ICUS [J].
Claudon, Michel ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. ;
Choi, Byung Ihn ;
Cosgrove, David O. ;
Kudo, Masatoshi ;
Nolsoe, Christian P. ;
Piscaglia, Fabio ;
Wilson, Stephanie R. ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Chammas, Maria C. ;
Chaubal, Nitin G. ;
Chen, Min-Hua ;
Clevert, Dirk Andre ;
Correas, Jean Michel ;
Ding, Hong ;
Forsberg, Flemming ;
Fowlkes, J. Brian ;
Gibson, Robert N. ;
Goldberg, Barry B. ;
Lassau, Nathalie ;
Leen, Edward L. S. ;
Mattrey, Robert F. ;
Moriyasu, Fuminori ;
Solbiati, Luigi ;
Weskott, Hans-Peter ;
Xu, Hui-Xiong .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 39 (02) :187-210
[3]   Angioarchitecture and blood circulation in focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver [J].
Fukukura, Y ;
Nakashima, O ;
Kusaba, A ;
Kage, M ;
Kojiro, M .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 29 (03) :470-475
[4]   Software-based quantification of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal liver lesions-A feasibility study [J].
Goertz, Ruediger S. ;
Bernatik, Thomas ;
Strobel, Deike ;
Hahn, Eckhart G. ;
Haendl, Thomas .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 75 (02) :E22-E26
[5]   Noninvasive Contrast-enhanced US Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Microcirculation in a Murine Model: Effect of Discontinuing Anti-VEGF Therapy [J].
Guibal, Aymeric ;
Taillade, Laurent ;
Mule, Sebastien ;
Comperat, Eva ;
Badachi, Yasmina ;
Golmard, Jean Louis ;
Le Guillou-Buffello, Delphine ;
Rixe, Olivier ;
Bridal, S. Lori ;
Lucidarme, Olivier .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (02) :420-429
[6]  
Hamilton SR, 2000, WORLD HLTH CLASSIFIC, P166
[7]   Differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia with quantitative parametric analysis in contrast-enhanced sonography [J].
Huang-Wei, C ;
Bleuzen, A ;
Bourlier, P ;
Roumy, J ;
Bouakaz, A ;
Pourcelot, LA ;
Tranquart, F .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (03) :363-368
[8]   Focal nodular hyperplasia: Findings at state-of-the-art MR imaging, US, CT, and pathologic analysis [J].
Hussain, SM ;
Terkivatan, T ;
Zondervan, FE ;
Lanjouw, EE ;
de Rave, S ;
Ifzermans, JNM .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (01) :3-17
[9]   Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: Imaging and pathologic findings in 31 recent cases [J].
Ichikawa, T ;
Federle, MP ;
Grazioli, L ;
Madariaga, J ;
Nalesnik, M ;
Marsh, W .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (02) :352-361
[10]  
Kim MJ, 2004, J ULTRAS MED, V23, P297, DOI 10.7863/jum.2004.23.2.297