Microscopic anisotropy misestimation in spherical-mean single diffusion encoding MRI

被引:51
|
作者
Henriques, Rafael Neto [1 ]
Jespersen, Sune N. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Shemesh, Noam [1 ]
机构
[1] Champalimaud Ctr Unknown, Champalimaud Neurosci Programme, Av Brasilia, P-1400038 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Aarhus Univ, CFIN, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Clin Inst, MINDLab, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Aarhus, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
double diffusion encoding; diffusion kurtosis; diffusion MRI; diffusion tensor; microscopic fractional anisotropy; single diffusion encoding; spherical mean technique; COMPARTMENT SHAPE ANISOTROPY; WHITE-MATTER; ORIENTATION DISPERSION; TISSUE-MICROSTRUCTURE; RESTRICTED DIFFUSION; WATER DIFFUSION; ENSEMBLE ANISOTROPY; AXON DIAMETER; FIELD; TENSOR;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.27606
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Microscopic fractional anisotropy (mu FA) can disentangle microstructural information from orientation dispersion. While double diffusion encoding (DDE) MRI methods are widely used to extract accurate mu FA, it has only recently been proposed that powder-averaged single diffusion encoding (SDE) signals, when coupled with the diffusion standard model (SM) and a set of constraints, could be used for mu FA estimation. This study aims to evaluate mu FA as derived from the spherical mean technique (SMT) set of constraints, as well as more generally for powder-averaged SM signals. Methods: SDE experiments were performed at 16.4 T on an ex vivo mouse brain (Delta/delta = 12/1.5 ms). The mu FA maps obtained from powder-averaged SDE, signals were then compared to maps obtained from DDE-MRI experiments (Delta/tau/delta = 12/12/1.5 ms), which allow a model-free estimation of mu FA. Theory and simulations that consider different types of heterogeneity are presented for corroborating the experimental findings. Results: mu FA, as well as other estimates derived from powder-averaged SDE signals produced large deviations from the ground truth in both gray and white matter. Simulations revealed that these misestimations are likely a consequence of factors not considered by the underlying microstructural models (such as intercomponent and intracompartmental kurtosis). Conclusion: Powder-averaged SMT and (2-component) SM are unable to accurately report mu FA and other microstructural parameters in ex vivo tissues. Improper model assumptions and constraints can significantly compromise parameter specificity. Further developments and validations are required prior to implementation of these models in clinical or preclinical research.
引用
收藏
页码:3245 / 3261
页数:17
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Neurite density imaging versus imaging of microscopic anisotropy in diffusion MRI: A model comparison using spherical tensor encoding
    Lampinen, Bjorn
    Szczepankiewicz, Filip
    Martensson, Johan
    van Westen, Danielle
    Sundgren, Pia C.
    Nilsson, Markus
    NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 147 : 517 - 531
  • [2] Double oscillating diffusion encoding and sensitivity to microscopic anisotropy
    Ianus, Andrada
    Shemesh, Noam
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Drobnjak, Ivana
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (02) : 550 - 564
  • [3] Model-based estimation of microscopic anisotropy using diffusion MRI: a simulation study
    Ianus, Andrada
    Drobnjak, Ivana
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 29 (05) : 672 - 685
  • [4] In vivo detection of microscopic anisotropy using quadruple pulsed-field gradient (qPFG) diffusion MRI on a clinical scanner
    Avram, Alexandru V.
    Oezarslan, Evren
    Sarlls, Joelle E.
    Basser, Peter J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2013, 64 : 229 - 239
  • [5] Validation and noise robustness assessment of microscopic anisotropy estimation with clinically feasible double diffusion encoding MRI
    Kerkela, Leevi
    Henriques, Rafael Neto
    Hall, Matt G.
    Clark, Chris A.
    Shemesh, Noam
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 83 (05) : 1698 - 1710
  • [6] Detection of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in human cortical gray matter in vivo with double diffusion encoding
    Lawrenz, Marco
    Finsterbusch, Juergen
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 81 (02) : 1296 - 1306
  • [7] Apparent propagator anisotropy from single-shell diffusion MRI acquisitions
    Aja-Fernandez, Santiago
    Tristan-Vega, Antonio
    Jones, Derek K.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 85 (05) : 2869 - 2881
  • [8] In vivo demonstration of microscopic anisotropy in the human kidney using multidimensional diffusion MRI
    Nery, Fabio
    Szczepankiewicz, Filip
    Kerkela, Leevi
    Hall, Matt G.
    Kaden, Enrico
    Gordon, Isky
    Thomas, David L.
    Clark, Chris A.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 82 (06) : 2160 - 2168
  • [9] Single- and double-Diffusion encoding MRI for studying ex vivo apparent axon diameter distribution in spinal cord white matter
    Anaby, Debbie
    Morozov, Darya
    Seroussi, Inbar
    Hametner, Simon
    Sochen, Nir
    Cohen, Yoram
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2019, 32 (12)
  • [10] Meningioma microstructure assessed by diffusion MRI: An investigation of the source of mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy by quantitative histology
    Brabec, Jan
    Friedjungova, Magda
    Vasata, Daniel
    Englund, Elisabet
    Bengzon, Johan
    Knutsson, Linda
    Szczepankiewicz, Filip
    van Westen, Danielle
    Sundgren, Pia C.
    Nilsson, Markus
    NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL, 2023, 37