Conceptualizing the transfer of knowledge across cases in transdisciplinary research

被引:67
作者
Adler, Carolina [1 ,2 ]
Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch [3 ]
Breu, Thomas [4 ]
Wiesmann, Urs [5 ]
Pohl, Christian [6 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Environm Philosophy Grp, CHN H 73-1,Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Transdisciplinar Lab D USYS TdLab, CHN H 73-1,Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Environm Philosophy Grp, CHN H 73-2,Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Bern, CDE, Hallerstr 10, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Bern, Inst Geog, Dept Integrat Geog, Hallerstr 10, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[6] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Decis, Transdisciplinar Lab D USYS TdLab, CHN K 78,Univ Str 16, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Case study; Evidence-based policy; Transferability; Transdisciplinary research; Quality; Scalability; POLICY; SCIENCE; PHILOSOPHY; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-017-0444-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transdisciplinary (TD) research is increasingly suggested as a means of tackling wicked problems by providing knowledge on solutions that serve as pathways towards sustainable development. In contrast to research striving for generalizable findings, TD research produces insights for a particular case and context. TD researchers, who build on other TD projects' results, need to know under what conditions knowledge gained from their case can be transferred to and applied in another case and context. Knowledge transfer between researchers and stakeholders is extensively discussed in the literature. However, a more profound understanding and management of the challenges related to knowledge transfer across cases, as it applies to TD research, are missing. We specify the challenges of knowledge transfer in TD research by distinguishing TD research for policy from conventional evidence-based policy, which relies on generalizing findings, such as randomized controlled trials. We also compare the functions that cases fulfil in other types of research that include basic, applied and ideographic research. We propose to conceptualize transferability of knowledge across cases as arguments by analogy. Methodologically, this would imply explicit consideration on whether the cases in question are sufficiently similar in relevant aspects while not dissimilar in other additional relevant aspects. On the one hand, this approach calls for explicit material considerations that are needed to learn about which aspects of cases are relevant. On the other hand, formal considerations on how to weigh perceived relevant similarities and dissimilarities of the cases at hand for transferability of knowledge, are needed. Empirical research on how projects in TD research deal with this problem is called for.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 190
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   The IPCC and treatment of uncertainties: topics and sources of dissensus [J].
Adler, Carolina E. ;
Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (05) :663-676
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Realexperimente: Okologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Journal for General Philosophy of Science
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CASE STUDY RES PRINC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, EVIDENCE BASED POLIC
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SAGE HDB QUALITATIVE
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, SCI LAWMODEL SYSTE
[8]  
[Anonymous], PEASANTS POWER APPL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Research on sustainability and global change - visions in science policy by Swiss researchers
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, BIOL CONSERV