PEER INTERACTION AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR ACCURACY AND FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT Monitoring, Practice, and Proceduralization

被引:90
作者
Sato, Masatoshi [1 ]
Lyster, Roy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Andres Bello, Dept English, Santiago, Chile
[2] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
关键词
FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION; INCIDENTAL FOCUS; CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION; EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE; LEARNERS FLUENCY; SELF-REPAIR; 2ND-LANGUAGE; RECASTS; LANGUAGE; CLASSROOM;
D O I
10.1017/S0272263112000356
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This quasi-experimental study is aimed at (a) teaching learners how to provide corrective feedback (CF) during peer interaction and (b) assessing the effects of peer interaction and CF on second language (L2) development. Four university-level English classes in Japan participated (N = 167), each assigned to one of four treatment conditions. Of the two CF groups, one was taught to provide prompts and the other to provide recasts. A third group participated in only peer-interaction activities, and a fourth served as the control group. After one semester of intervention, the two CF groups improved in both overall accuracy and fluency, measured as unpruned and pruned speech rates, whereas the peer-interaction-only group outperformed the control group only on fluency measures. This study draws on monitoring in speech-production theory and the declarative-procedural model of skill-acquisition theory to interpret these results, thus contributing a new theoretical approach to CF research in the context of peer interaction in which learners can be providers of CF. It is concluded that whereas peer interaction offered opportunities for repeated production practice, facilitating proceduralization, CF sharpened learners' ability to monitor both their own language production and that of their interlocutors.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 626
页数:36
相关论文
共 169 条
  • [11] TROUBLESHOOTING IN INTERACTION WITH LEARNERS - THE MORE THE MERRIER
    ASTON, G
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 1986, 7 (02) : 128 - 143
  • [12] Teachers' stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices
    Basturkmen, H
    Loewen, S
    Ellis, R
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2004, 25 (02) : 243 - 272
  • [13] Bejarano Y., 1997, SYSTEM, V25, P203, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00009-2
  • [14] Literacy and the processing of oral recasts in SLA
    Bigelow, Martha
    Delmas, Robert
    Hansen, Kit
    Tarone, Elaine
    [J]. TESOL QUARTERLY, 2006, 40 (04) : 665 - 689
  • [15] Block David., 2003, SOCIAL TURN 2 LANGUA
  • [16] Bruton A., 1980, RELC J, V11, P49, DOI DOI 10.1177/003368828001100204
  • [17] Repair sequences in Spanish L2 dyadic discourse: A descriptive study
    Buckwalter, P
    [J]. MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2001, 85 (03) : 380 - 397
  • [18] Bygate M., 1996, CHALLENGE CHANGE LAN, P136
  • [19] C Elder., 2009, IMPLICIT EXPLICIT KN, DOI DOI 10.21832/9781847691767
  • [20] Chamot A., 1999, The learning strategies handbook