Dyadic Invariance of the Adult Self-Report and Adult Behavior Checklist: Evidence From Young Adult Romantic Couples

被引:7
作者
DeLuca, Haylee K. [1 ]
Sorgente, Angela [2 ]
van Dulmen, Manfred H. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kent State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, Kent, OH 44242 USA
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Psychol, Milan, Italy
关键词
adult self-report; behavior problems; cross-informants; romantic relationships; young adulthood; CROSS-INFORMANT CORRELATIONS; FIT INDEXES; PERSONALITY; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY; RATINGS; CHILD; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY; COVARIANCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1037/pas0000658
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The current paper investigated the invariance of the behavior problem scales of two measures from the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, the Adult Self Report (ASR) and the Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL), across members of young adult romantic couples. Data were derived from three studies examining romantic relationships in young adulthood (total N = 672). Using a series of confirmatory factor analysis models, we tested levels of invariance of the behavior problem subscales of the ASR/ABCL across self-and partner-reports. All behavior problem subscales demonstrated invariant factor structures across self-and partner-reports. However, only the attention problems, aggressive behavior, and rule-breaking subscales achieved full metric invariance for both men and women. The intrusiveness (for men) and somatic complaints (for women) subscales also met full metric invariance. The remaining subscales only met partial metric invariance for both men (withdrawn, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints) and women (withdrawn, anxious/depressed, intrusiveness). All subscales only met partial scalar invariance. The current study extends the literature on cross-informant assessments by moving beyond studies of mean differences or correlations between informant reports. Moreover, our findings indicate that understanding agreement between informants should include multiple levels of measurement, such as factor structure, factor loadings, and item means. We recommend careful consideration of these issues when using the ASR/ABCL in a cross-informant framework. Public Significance Statement This study extends the psychometric properties of the behavior problem scales from the Adult Self Report (ASR) and Adult Behavior Checklist (ABCL) in a sample of young adult couples. Our findings indicate attention to multiple levels of measurement (error) is essential when using the ASR/ABCL in a cross-informant framework.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 209
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [21] The effect of item observability, clarity and wording on patient/nurse ratings when using the ASA scale
    Halfens, RJG
    van Alphen, A
    Hasman, A
    Philipsen, H
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 1999, 13 (03) : 159 - 164
  • [22] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives
    Hu, Li-tze
    Bentler, Peter M.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) : 1 - 55
  • [23] Syndromes of collateral-reported psychopathology for ages 18-59 in 18 Societies
    Ivanova, Masha Y.
    Achenbach, Thomas M.
    Rescorla, Leslie A.
    Turner, Lori V.
    Arnadottir, Hervoer Alma
    Au, Alma
    Caldas, J. Carlos
    Chaalal, Nebia
    Chen, Yi Chuen
    da Rocha, Marina M.
    Decoster, Jeroen
    Fontaine, Johnny R. J.
    Funabiki, Yasuko
    Guomundsson, Halldor S.
    Kim, Young Ah
    Leung, Patrick
    Liu, Jianghong
    Malykh, Sergey
    Markovic, Jasminka
    Oh, Kyung Ja
    Petot, Jean-Michel
    Samaniego, Virginia C.
    Silvares, Edwiges Ferreira de Mattos
    Simulioniene, Roma
    Sobot, Valentina
    Sokoli, Elvisa
    Sun, Guiju
    Talcott, Joel B.
    Vazquez, Natalia
    Zasepa, Ewa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 15 (01) : 18 - 28
  • [24] Kenny D. A., 2020, Measuring Model Fit
  • [25] Kronenberger W. G., 1996, PSYCCRITIQUES, V41, P1063
  • [26] Little TD., 2013, LONGITUDINAL STRUCTU
  • [27] MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE, FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND FACTORIAL INVARIANCE
    MEREDITH, W
    [J]. PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1993, 58 (04) : 525 - 543
  • [28] Psychological testing and psychological assessment - A review of evidence and issues
    Meyer, GJ
    Finn, SE
    Eyde, LD
    Kay, GG
    Moreland, KL
    Dies, RR
    Eisman, EJ
    Kubiszyn, TW
    Reed, GM
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2001, 56 (02) : 128 - 165
  • [29] Milfont TL, 2010, INT J PSYCHOL RES, V3, P111
  • [30] Cross-informant ratings of social competence in children and adolescents
    Renk, K
    Phares, V
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2004, 24 (02) : 239 - 254