Comparison of the long-term outcomes between incontinent men and women treated with artificial urinary sphincter

被引:56
作者
Petero, VG [1 ]
Diokno, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] William Beaumont Hosp, Dept Urol, Royal Oak, MI 48073 USA
关键词
bladder; urethra; urinary incontinence; urinary sphincter; artificial;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00243-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared the long-term outcome of AUS between men and women who received the device for the management of stress urinary incontinence. Materials and Methods: Between August 1983 and January 2004, 126 consecutive patients received the AUS AMS 800 (TM) at our center placed by the senior author (ACD). Of these patients 108 (53 men, 55 women) and 168 devices (88 in men, 80 in women) were available for review. Outcome measures include complications, duration and etiology of AUS failure, and satisfactory continence. Results: Mean followup was 8.1 +/- 5.6 years. Of the 108 patients 18 (40%) men and 31 (56%) women had no complications (p = 0.09). Of the 168 devices 76 (45%) eventually failed (44 or 50% in men, 32 or 40% in women, p = 0.19). The incidences of failed device classified as mechanical, nonmechanical or iatrogenic were not significantly different (p = 0.07). Median device durations were 6.9 and 11.2 years in men and women, respectively (p = 0.002). Satisfactory continence was achieved in 82% of patients, in 43 (81%) men and in 46 (84%) women (p = 0.73), including 5 (9%) men and 35 (64%) women who were dry (0 pads, p = 0.01), 28 (53%) men and 4 (7%) women who wear 1 pad (p = 0.01), and 10 (19%) men and 7 (13%) women who use 2 pads per day. Conclusions: There were no differences in overall satisfactory continence and device failure rates. However, women have a higher dry rate (0 pad use) and longer functioning device duration compared to their male counterparts.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 609
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bosch J L, 2000, Curr Opin Urol, V10, P219
  • [2] The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test
    Costa, P
    Mottet, N
    Rabut, B
    Thuret, R
    Ben Naoum, K
    Wagner, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) : 1172 - 1176
  • [3] EXPERIENCE WITH ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER AT MICHIGAN
    DIOKNO, AC
    TAUB, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1976, 116 (04) : 496 - 500
  • [4] ELLIOT DS, 2004, J UROLOGY, V159, P1206
  • [5] PREGNANCY IN PATIENTS WITH THE ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER
    FISHMAN, IJ
    SCOTT, FB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (02) : 340 - 341
  • [6] Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: A risk and outcome analysis
    Gomha, MA
    Boone, TB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (02) : 591 - 596
  • [7] LONG-TERM RESULTS OF THE ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER IN MALE-PATIENTS WITH NEUROGENIC BLADDER
    GONZALEZ, R
    MERINO, FG
    VAUGHN, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (02) : 769 - 770
  • [8] Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: Long-term subjective results
    Gousse, AE
    Madjar, S
    Lambert, MM
    Fishman, IJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (05) : 1755 - 1758
  • [9] MAYO-CLINIC EXPERIENCE WITH USE OF THE AMS800 ARTIFICIAL URINARY SPHINCTER FOR URINARY-INCONTINENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    GUNDIAN, JC
    BARRETT, DM
    PARULKAR, BG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (06) : 1459 - 1461
  • [10] Herschorn S, 1999, INCONTINENCE, P691