Changes in genetic architecture during relaxation in Drosophila melanogaster selected on divergent virgin life span

被引:17
|
作者
Vermeulen, CJ [1 ]
Bijlsma, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Haren, Netherlands
关键词
aging; artificial selection; Drosophila melanogaster; genetic architecture; life history; life span; relaxation; reproduction; reversed selection; trade-off;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00972.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Artificial selection experiments often confer important information on the genetic correlations constraining the evolution of life history. After artificial selection has ceased however, selection pressures in the culture environment can change the correlation matrix again. Here, we reinvestigate direct and correlated responses in a set of lines of Drosophila melanogaster that were selected on virgin life span and for which selection has been relaxed for 10 years. The decrease in progeny production in long-lived lines, a strong indication of antagonistic pleiotropy, had disappeared during relaxation. This was associated with a higher cost of reproduction to long-lived flies in mated, but not in virgin life span. These data strongly suggest that genetic mechanisms of mated and virgin life span determination are partly independent. Furthermore, data on body weight, developmental time and viability indicated deleterious effects of longevity selection in either direction, giving rise to a nonlinear relationship with life span for these characters. In order to reclaim original patterns, we founded a new set of derived lines by resuming selection in mixed replicate lines of the original set. Although selection was successful, most patterns in correlated characters remained, showing that these new patterns are resistant to new episodes of selection.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 227
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic Influences of the Microbiota on the Life Span of Drosophila melanogaster
    Matthews, Melinda K.
    Wilcox, Halley
    Hughes, Rachel
    Veloz, Madeline
    Hammer, Austin
    Banks, Bethany
    Walters, Amber
    Schneider, Kyle J.
    Sexton, Corinne E.
    Chaston, John M.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 86 (10)
  • [2] The complex genetic architecture of Drosophila life span
    Leips, J
    Mackay, TFC
    EXPERIMENTAL AGING RESEARCH, 2002, 28 (04) : 361 - 390
  • [3] Developmental and age-specific effects of selection on divergent virgin life span on fat content and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster
    Vermeulen, C. J.
    Van De Zande, L.
    Bijlsma, R.
    JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 52 (09) : 910 - 919
  • [4] Life span extension of Drosophila melanogaster:: Genetic and population studies
    Harshman, LG
    LIFE SPAN: EVOLUTIONARY, ECOLOGICAL, AND DEMOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVES, 2003, : 99 - 126
  • [5] Life span extension of Drosophila melanogaster:: Genetic and population studies
    Harshman, Lawrence G.
    POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2003, 29 : 99 - 126
  • [6] GENETIC CONTROL OF ADULT LIFE SPAN IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    CLARK, AM
    GOULD, AB
    EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 1970, 5 (02) : 157 - &
  • [7] Context-dependent genetic architecture of Drosophila life span
    Huang, Wen
    Campbell, Terry
    Carbone, Mary Anna
    Jones, W. Elizabeth
    Unselt, Desiree
    Anholt, Robert R. H.
    Mackay, Trudy F. C.
    PLOS BIOLOGY, 2020, 18 (03)
  • [8] Genetic analysis of extended life span in Drosophila melanogaster I. RAPD screen for genetic divergence between selected and control lines
    James W. Curtsinger
    Hank H. Fukui
    Amy S. Resler
    Kristi Kelly
    Aziz A. Khazaeli
    Genetica, 1998, 104 : 21 - 32
  • [9] Genetic analysis of extended life span in Drosophila melanogaster -: I.: RAPD screen for genetic divergence between selected and control lines
    Curtsinger, JW
    Fukui, HH
    Resler, AS
    Kelly, K
    Khazaeli, AA
    GENETICA, 1998, 104 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [10] Radiation-induced changes in the life span of laboratory Drosophila melanogaster strains
    Zainullin, VG
    Moskalev, AA
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 2001, 37 (09) : 1094 - 1095