Policy reforms to promote efficient and sustainable water use in Swiss agriculture

被引:5
作者
Finger, Robert [1 ]
Lehmann, Niklaus [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Agr Econ & Rural Policy Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] ETH, Agri Food & Agri Environm Econ Grp, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agricultural water use; Crowding out effects; Drip irrigation; Subsidies; Switzerland; Water prices; IRRIGATION; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.2166/wp.2012.152
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The more sustainable use of scarce water resources is a policy goal in several countries. In this regard, current discussions on potential policy reforms in Switzerland revolve around the subsidization of water-saving irrigation technologies. Today, the share of drip irrigation systems is low, at 3%. In Switzerland, environmental laws specify levels of water flow that must not be undercut. Variable pricing of water, however, has not yet been used. This paper analyzes whether subsidies on water-saving irrigation techniques would be beneficial in this legislative setting, and shows that such subsidies may have crowding out effects because they could provide incentives to switch from non-irrigated crops (e. g. wheat) to the production of crops (e. g. potatoes) that require irrigation. This may result in even higher water withdrawal rates. Such an increased competition for water resources may also result in adverse conditions for farmers. By contrast, our analysis shows the implementation of water prices could lead to a sustainable increase in the share of water-saving technologies, to a shift from irrigated to non-irrigated crops, and therefore to a reduction of overall water use in agriculture. Thus, the introduction of water prices should have absolute priority if agricultural water policies are reformed in Switzerland.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 901
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Duration analysis of adoption of drip irrigation technology in southeastern Spain [J].
Alcon, Francisco ;
Dolores de Miguel, Maria ;
Burton, Michael .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (06) :991-1001
[2]  
BAFU, 2000, ANG RESTW WIE KONN S
[3]   Water management and irrigated agriculture in Italy: multicriteria analysis of alternative policy scenarios [J].
Bartolini, F. ;
Gallerani, V. ;
Raggi, M. ;
Viaggi, D. .
WATER POLICY, 2010, 12 (01) :135-147
[4]  
BLW, 2011, VERN AGR 2014 2017
[5]   Estimating the benefits of low flow alleviation in rivers: the case of the Ticino River [J].
Buchli, L ;
Filippini, M ;
Banfi, S .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2003, 35 (05) :585-590
[6]  
Bundesamt fur Landwirtschaft (BLW), 2009, WEGL LANDW PLAN
[7]  
Bundesamt fur Umwelt Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL) Bundesamt fur Wasser und Geologie (BWG) & Meteoschweiz, 2004, SCHRIFTENREIHE UMWEL, V369, P1
[8]  
EC, 2005, AGR MEAS OV GEN PRIN
[9]  
Finger R, 2011, ECON BULL, V31, P2138
[10]  
Finger R, 2012, EUROCHOICES, V11, P28, DOI 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2012.00222.x