Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:7
|
作者
Ebert, Jay R. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [3 ]
Edwards, Peter K. [1 ,2 ]
Joss, Brendan K. [2 ]
D'Alessandro, Peter [4 ]
Janes, Greg [5 ]
Annear, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci Exercise & Sport Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] HFRC Rehabil Clin, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Bethesda Hosp, Coastal Orthopaed, Claremont, WA, Australia
[5] Perth Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
knee surgery; reinjury; strength; functional assessment; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; GRAFT RUPTURE; POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION; YOUNGER PATIENTS; INCREASED RISK; INJURY; STRENGTH; REVISION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2019-0291
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. Objective: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. Design: Survey. Participants: Members of the Australian Knee Society. Main Outcome Measures: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. Results: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be <= 15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until >= 9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). Conclusions: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 975
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Return-to-Sport Testing in Young Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Patel, Snehal
    Marrone, William
    Vignona III, Patrick
    HSS JOURNAL, 2024, 20 (03) : 431 - 436
  • [32] Clinical Decision Algorithm Associated With Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Albano, Thamlya Rocha
    Silva Rodrigues, Carlos Augusto
    Pereira Melo, Antonio Kayro
    de Paula Lima, Pedro Olavo
    Leao Almeida, Gabriel Peixoto
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2020, 55 (07) : 691 - 698
  • [33] Advanced training enhances readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Meierbachtol, Adam
    Obermeier, Michael
    Yungtum, William
    Bottoms, John
    Paur, Eric
    Nelson, Bradley J.
    Tompkins, Marc
    Chmielewski, Terese L.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2022, 40 (01) : 191 - 199
  • [34] Outcomes and Return to Sport After Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Adolescent Athletes
    Saper, Michael
    Pearce, Stephanie
    Shung, Joseph
    Zondervan, Robert
    Ostrander, Roger
    Andrews, James R.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (04)
  • [35] Psychological Responses During Latter Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
    Russell, Hayley C.
    Arendt, Elizabeth A.
    Wiese-Bjornstal, Diane M.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2024, 59 (06) : 627 - 632
  • [36] Current Controversies in Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Pezzullo, David J.
    Fadale, Paul
    SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW, 2010, 18 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [37] Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Physically Active Adults
    Korkoman, Abdulrahman J.
    Aljadaan, Bader
    Alqarni, Anas
    Alshomrany, Abdullah A.
    Almuawi, Abdullah N.
    Alhalafi, Abdullah F.
    Alshahrani, Abdulmohsen N.
    Alqahtani, Masoud M.
    Althunayan, Kady
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [38] Return to Sport After Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Its Effect on Subsequent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
    Dekker, Travis J.
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    Dale, Kevin M.
    Garrett, William E.
    Taylor, Dean C.
    Riboh, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (11) : 897 - 904
  • [39] Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review
    van Haren, Inge E. P. M.
    van der Worp, Maarten P.
    van Rijn, Rogier
    Stubbe, Janine H.
    van Cingel, Robert E. H.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Staal, J. Bart
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2025, 68 (03)
  • [40] RETURN TO PLAY AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    Goes, Rodrigo A.
    Cossich, Victor R. A.
    Franca, Braulio R.
    Campos, Andre Siqueira
    Souza, Gabriel Garcez A.
    Bastos, Ricardo do Carmo
    Grangeiro Neto, Joao A.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE MEDICINA DO ESPORTE, 2020, 26 (06) : 478 - 486