Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:7
|
作者
Ebert, Jay R. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [3 ]
Edwards, Peter K. [1 ,2 ]
Joss, Brendan K. [2 ]
D'Alessandro, Peter [4 ]
Janes, Greg [5 ]
Annear, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci Exercise & Sport Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] HFRC Rehabil Clin, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Bethesda Hosp, Coastal Orthopaed, Claremont, WA, Australia
[5] Perth Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
knee surgery; reinjury; strength; functional assessment; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; GRAFT RUPTURE; POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION; YOUNGER PATIENTS; INCREASED RISK; INJURY; STRENGTH; REVISION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2019-0291
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. Objective: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. Design: Survey. Participants: Members of the Australian Knee Society. Main Outcome Measures: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. Results: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be <= 15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until >= 9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). Conclusions: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 975
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Factors Associated With Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery
    Webster, Kate E.
    Nagelli, Christopher V.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (07) : 1545 - 1550
  • [12] Rehabilitation duration and time of starting sport-related activities associated with return to the previous level of sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yabroudi, Mohammad A.
    Bashaireh, Khaldoon
    Nawasreh, Zakariya H.
    Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
    Logerstedt, David
    Maayah, Mikhled
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2021, 49 : 164 - 170
  • [13] Return to Sport Tests' Prognostic Value for Reinjury Risk after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Ashigbi, Evans Yayra Kwaku
    Banzer, Winfried
    Niederer, Daniel
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (06) : 1263 - 1271
  • [14] Prospective study of functional outcomes and return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the knee
    Laboute, E.
    James-Belin, E.
    Ucay, O.
    Caubere, A.
    Verhaeghe, E.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (02) : 455 - 463
  • [15] Strength Asymmetry and Landing Mechanics at Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Schmitt, Laura C.
    Paterno, Mark V.
    Ford, Kevin R.
    Myer, Gregory D.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2015, 47 (07) : 1426 - 1434
  • [16] Knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evaluation of a rehabilitation protocol
    Gadea F.
    Monnot D.
    Quélard B.
    Mortati R.
    Thaunat M.
    Fayard J.M.
    Sonnery-Cottet B.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (5) : 789 - 795
  • [17] A research update on the state of play for return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Webster, Kate E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [18] Performance and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Professional Baseball Players
    Erickson, Brandon J.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    D'Angelo, John
    Ma, Kevin
    Dahm, Diane L.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (10)
  • [19] Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Panariello, Robert A.
    Stump, Timothy J.
    Maddalone, Dean
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 24 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [20] Return-to-Sport Criteria After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Fail to Identify the Risk of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
    Paterno, Mark, V
    Rauh, Mitchell J.
    Thomas, Staci
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    Schmitt, Laura C.
    JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING, 2022, 57 (9-10) : 937 - 945