Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:7
|
作者
Ebert, Jay R. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [3 ]
Edwards, Peter K. [1 ,2 ]
Joss, Brendan K. [2 ]
D'Alessandro, Peter [4 ]
Janes, Greg [5 ]
Annear, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci Exercise & Sport Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] HFRC Rehabil Clin, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Bethesda Hosp, Coastal Orthopaed, Claremont, WA, Australia
[5] Perth Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
knee surgery; reinjury; strength; functional assessment; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; GRAFT RUPTURE; POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION; YOUNGER PATIENTS; INCREASED RISK; INJURY; STRENGTH; REVISION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2019-0291
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. Objective: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. Design: Survey. Participants: Members of the Australian Knee Society. Main Outcome Measures: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. Results: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be <= 15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until >= 9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). Conclusions: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 975
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current perspectives of Australian therapists on rehabilitation and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Webster, Kate E.
    Edwards, Peter K.
    Joss, Brendan K.
    D'Alessandro, Peter
    Janes, Greg
    Annear, Peter
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2019, 35 : 139 - 145
  • [2] Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Simonsson, Rebecca
    Piussi, Ramana
    Hogberg, Johan
    Sundberg, Axel
    Senorski, Eric Hamrin
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (03) : 513 - 533
  • [3] Current perspectives of New Zealand physiotherapists on rehabilitation and return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey
    Fausett, Wayne A.
    Reid, Duncan A.
    Larmer, Peter J.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2022, 53 : 166 - 172
  • [4] Predicting readiness for return to sport and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation
    van Haren, Inge E. P. M.
    van Cingel, Robert E. H.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    van Melick, Nicky
    Stubbe, Janine H.
    Bloo, Hans
    Groenewoud, J. Hans M. M.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Staal, J. Bart
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 66 (03)
  • [5] Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Response
    Myer, Gregory D.
    Martin, Larry, Jr.
    Ford, Kevin R.
    Paterno, Mark V.
    Schmitt, Laura C.
    Heidt, Robert S., Jr.
    Colosimo, Angelo
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (04): : NP19 - NP20
  • [6] KNEE REHABILITATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR
    PAULOS, L
    NOYES, FR
    GROOD, E
    BUTLER, DL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1981, 9 (03): : 140 - 149
  • [7] FUNCTIONAL KNEE REHABILITATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
    SAUTER, D
    VERAART, B
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH, 1988, 11 (03) : 286 - 290
  • [8] Professional Football: Return to Sport after anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Graewert, Stephanie
    SPORTVERLETZUNG-SPORTSCHADEN, 2022, 36 (03) : 123 - 125
  • [9] Repeat Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Return to Sport in Australian Soccer Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft
    Manara, Jonathan R.
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Kilani, Faisal M.
    de Camino, Gerardo Zelaya
    Monk, Claire
    Sundaraj, Keran
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    Roe, Justin P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (13): : 3533 - 3543
  • [10] Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Julian Feller
    Kate E. Webster
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 285 - 290