Current Perspectives of the Australian Knee Society on Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

被引:7
|
作者
Ebert, Jay R. [1 ,2 ]
Webster, Kate E. [3 ]
Edwards, Peter K. [1 ,2 ]
Joss, Brendan K. [2 ]
D'Alessandro, Peter [4 ]
Janes, Greg [5 ]
Annear, Peter [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Sch Human Sci Exercise & Sport Sci, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] HFRC Rehabil Clin, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Bethesda Hosp, Coastal Orthopaed, Claremont, WA, Australia
[5] Perth Orthopaed & Sports Med Ctr, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
knee surgery; reinjury; strength; functional assessment; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; PATELLAR TENDON; GRAFT RUPTURE; POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION; YOUNGER PATIENTS; INCREASED RISK; INJURY; STRENGTH; REVISION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1123/jsr.2019-0291
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Context: The importance of rehabilitation and evaluation prior to return to sport (RTS) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been reported. Objective: This study sought to investigate current perspectives of Australian orthopedic surgeons on rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. Design: Survey. Participants: Members of the Australian Knee Society. Main Outcome Measures: A 14-question survey was disseminated to Australian Knee Society members (orthopedic surgeons) to investigate (1) preferred graft choice, (2) estimated retear rate, (3) importance of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, and (4) preferred timing of RTS and evaluation prior to RTS discharge. Results: Of all 85 Australian Knee Society members contacted, 86% (n = 73) responded. Overall, 66 respondents (90.4%) preferentially used hamstring tendon autografts. All surgeons estimated their retear rate to be <= 15%, with 31 (42.5%) <5%. Twenty-eight surgeons (38.4%) reported no benefit in preoperative rehabilitation. The majority of surgeons (82.2%-94.5%) reported that postoperative rehabilitation was important within various periods throughout the postoperative timeline. Most surgeons did not permit RTS until >= 9 months (n = 56, 76.7%), with 17 (23.3%) allowing RTS between 6 and 9 months. The most highly reported considerations for RTS clearance were time (90.4%), functional capacity (90.4%), and strength (78.1%). Most commonly, knee strength and/or function was assessed via referral to a preferred rehabilitation specialist (50.7%) or with the surgeon at their practice (11.0%). Conclusions: This survey revealed variation in beliefs and practices surrounding rehabilitation and RTS evaluation. This is despite the current evidence demonstrating the benefit of preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, as well as the emerging potential of RTS assessments consisting of strength and functional measures to reduce reinjury rates.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 975
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current perspectives of Australian therapists on rehabilitation and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey
    Ebert, Jay R.
    Webster, Kate E.
    Edwards, Peter K.
    Joss, Brendan K.
    D'Alessandro, Peter
    Janes, Greg
    Annear, Peter
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2019, 35 : 139 - 145
  • [2] Repeat Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Return to Sport in Australian Soccer Players After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft
    Manara, Jonathan R.
    Salmon, Lucy J.
    Kilani, Faisal M.
    de Camino, Gerardo Zelaya
    Monk, Claire
    Sundaraj, Keran
    Pinczewski, Leo A.
    Roe, Justin P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (13) : 3533 - 3543
  • [3] Current perspectives of New Zealand physiotherapists on rehabilitation and return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A survey
    Fausett, Wayne A.
    Reid, Duncan A.
    Larmer, Peter J.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2022, 53 : 166 - 172
  • [4] The association of psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and hip and knee landing kinematics
    Nagelli, Christopher, V
    Webster, Kate E.
    Di Stasi, Stephanie
    Wordeman, Samuel C.
    Hewett, Timothy E.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2019, 68 : 104 - 108
  • [5] Low Rates of Return to Preinjury Sport After Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Webster, Kate E.
    Feller, Julian A.
    Kimp, Alexander J.
    Whitehead, Timothy S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (02) : 334 - 338
  • [6] Rehabilitation and Return to Play Following,anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Panariello, Robert A.
    Stump, Timothy J.
    Allen, Answorth A.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 25 (03) : 181 - 193
  • [7] Knee strength symmetry at 4 months is associated with criteria and rates of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Drigny, Joffrey
    Ferrandez, Clemence
    Gauthier, Antoine
    Guermont, Henri
    Praz, Cesar
    Reboursiere, Emmanuel
    Hulet, Christophe
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2022, 65 (04)
  • [8] Return to knee-strenuous sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a report from a rehabilitation outcome registry of patient characteristics
    Senorski, Eric Hamrin
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Thomee, Christoffer
    Beischer, Susanne
    Karlsson, Jon
    Thomee, Roland
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (05) : 1364 - 1374
  • [9] Return-to-sport tests: Do they reduce risk of re-rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?
    Poblete, David Figueroa
    Duque, Waldo Gonzalez
    Caroca, Daniela Landea
    Castillo, Camila Tapia
    Ventura, Daniela Erskine
    JOURNAL OF ISAKOS JOINT DISORDERS & ORTHOPAEDIC SPORTS MEDICINE, 2025, 11
  • [10] Predicting readiness for return to sport and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation
    van Haren, Inge E. P. M.
    van Cingel, Robert E. H.
    Verbeek, Andre L. M.
    van Melick, Nicky
    Stubbe, Janine H.
    Bloo, Hans
    Groenewoud, J. Hans M. M.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    Staal, J. Bart
    ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 66 (03)