Survival After Left Ventricular Assist Device With and Without Temporary Right Ventricular Support

被引:49
|
作者
Lazar, John F. [1 ]
Swartz, Michael F. [1 ]
Schiralli, Matthew P. [1 ]
Schneider, Marabel [1 ]
Pisula, Brian [1 ]
Hallinan, William [1 ]
Hicks, George L., Jr. [1 ]
Massey, H. Todd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Div Cardiac Surg, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2013年 / 96卷 / 06期
关键词
EXPERIENCE; PLACEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Right ventricular (RV) failure after the insertion of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) historically results in poor outcomes. Patients requiring temporary RV support after LVAD insertion are a heterogeneous group of patients consisting of those in cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction, to those with chronic decompensated heart failure. For patients requiring biventricular support, we have used a hybrid system consisting of a HeartMate II LVAD and CentriMag right ventricular assist device (RVAD). The purpose of this study was to determine the 1-year survival in patients requiring isolated LVAD and patients requiring biventricular support. Methods. All patients who underwent HeartMate II LVAD alone or in conjunction with a temporary CentriMag RVAD were examined from 2006 to 2011. Preoperative demographics, operative outcomes, and survival were analyzed. Results. A total of 139 patients required HeartMate II insertion; 34 (24%) required biventricular support at the time of HeartMate II implantation. The mean duration of biventricular support was 17 +/- 11.9 days (range, 6 to 56 days) with 91.8% (n = 31) of RVADs successfully explanted. Survival to hospital discharge was not different between groups (95.2 versus 88.2%; p = 0.2). However, 1-year survival was significantly greater in patients who required isolated HeartMate II LVAD (87% versus 77%; p = 0.03). Conclusions. Biventricular support using a HeartMate II LVAD and CentriMag RVAD resulted in limited mortality at hospital discharge. However biventricular dysfunction does not have a favorable outcome at 1 year when compared with patients requiring isolated HeartMate II. (C) 2013 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:2155 / 2160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Riebandt, Julia
    Haberl, Thomas
    Wiedemann, Dominik
    Moayedifar, R.
    Schloeglhofer, Thomas
    Mahr, Stephane
    Dimitrov, Kamen
    Angleitner, Philipp
    Laufer, Guenther
    Zimpfer, Daniel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (03) : 590 - 595
  • [32] 6 Months of "Temporary" Support by Levitronix Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Barbone, Alessandro
    Malvindi, Pietro Giorgio
    Sorabella, Robert A.
    Cortis, Graziano
    Tosi, Paolo F.
    Basciu, Alessio
    Ferrara, Pietro
    Raffa, Giuseppe
    Citterio, Enrico
    Settepani, Fabrizio
    Ornaghi, Diego
    Tarelli, Giuseppe
    Vitali, Ettore
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2012, 36 (07) : 639 - 642
  • [33] A new right ventricular assist device for right ventricular support
    Christiansen, S
    Brose, S
    Demircan, L
    Autschbach, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 24 (05) : 834 - 836
  • [34] Right Ventricular Assist Device Placement During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Associated With Improved Survival
    Crespo-Diaz, Ruben
    Mudy, Karol
    Khan, Nadeem
    Samara, Michael
    Eckman, Peter M.
    Sun, Benjamin
    Hryniewicz, Katarzyna
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2024, 70 (07) : 570 - 577
  • [35] Left Ventricular Assist Device in Right Ventricular Failure
    Parwani, P.
    Gowd, B. M. P.
    Nahar, R.
    Statz, C.
    O'Sullivan, D.
    Chomick, N.
    Radojevic, J.
    Gluck, J.
    Hammond, J.
    Wencker, D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S83 - S83
  • [36] Right Ventricular Assist Device Support After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Predicting a Poor Predictor.
    Singh, S.
    Hernandez, R.
    Anand, J.
    Baldwin, A.
    Sandoval-Martinez, E.
    Cohn, W.
    Frazier, O.
    Mallidi, H.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 421 - 421
  • [37] Right Ventricular Assist Device Support After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Predicting a Poor Predictor.
    Singh, S.
    Hernandez, R.
    Anand, J.
    Baldwin, A.
    Sandoval-Martinez, E.
    Cohn, W.
    Frazier, O.
    Mallidi, H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 421 - 421
  • [38] Similar left and right ventricular sarcomere structure after support with a left ventricular assist device suggests the utility of right ventricular biopsies to monitor left ventricular reverse remodeling
    de Jonge, N
    Lahpor, JR
    van Wichen, DF
    Kirkels, H
    Gmelig-Meyling, FHJ
    van den Tweel, JG
    Doevendans, PA
    de Weger, RA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 98 (03) : 465 - 470
  • [39] Right atrial and ventricular echocardiographic strain analysis predicts requirement for right ventricular support after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Charisopoulou, Dafni
    Banner, Nicholas R.
    Demetrescu, Camit
    Simon, Andre R.
    Haley, Shelley Rahman
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 20 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [40] Prediction of right ventricular dysfunction after left ventricular assist device implantation
    Nakatani, S
    Thomas, JD
    Savage, RM
    Vargo, RL
    Smedira, NG
    McCarthy, PM
    CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (09) : 216 - 221