Continuous performance task in ADHD: Is reaction time variability a key measure?

被引:23
作者
Levy, Florence [1 ,2 ]
Pipingas, Andrew [3 ]
Harris, Elizabeth V. [3 ]
Farrow, Maree [4 ]
Silberstein, Richard B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Head Child & Family East, Corner Barker & Avoca St, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[3] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Human Psychopharmacol, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Tasmania, Wicking Dementia Res & Educ Ctr, Hobart, Tas, Australia
来源
NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISEASE AND TREATMENT | 2018年 / 14卷
关键词
ADHD; continuous performance task; reaction time variability; stimulant medication; DISORDER; CHILDREN; FLUCTUATIONS;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S158308
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the use of the Continuous Performance Task (CPT) reaction time variability (intraindividual variability or standard deviation of reaction time), as a measure of vigilance in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and stimulant medication response, utilizing a simple CPT X-task vs an A-X-task. Method: Comparative analyses of two separate X-task vs A-X-task data sets, and subgroup analyses of performance on and off medication were conducted. Results: The CPT X-task reaction time variability had a direct relationship to ADHD clinician severity ratings, unlike the CPT A-X-task. Variability in X-task performance was reduced by medication compared with the children's unmedicated performance, but this effect did not reach significance. When the coefficient of variation was applied, severity measures and medication response were significant for the X-task, but not for the A-X-task. Conclusion: The CPT-X-task is a useful clinical screening test for ADHD and medication response. In particular, reaction time variability is related to default mode interference. The A-X-task is less useful in this regard.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 786
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, CONN CONT PERF TEST
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, VFifth, P1000, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1991, INTR TEST VAR ATT
  • [4] IS THE CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE TASK A VALUABLE RESEARCH TOOL FOR USE WITH CHILDREN WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER
    CORKUM, PV
    SIEGEL, LS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1993, 34 (07) : 1217 - 1239
  • [5] Erickson K, 2001, CHILD NEUROPSYCHOL, V7, P199
  • [6] Evaluating Vigilance Deficits in ADHD: A Meta-Analysis of CPT Performance
    Huang-Pollock, Cynthia L.
    Karalunas, Sarah L.
    Tam, Helen
    Moore, Amy N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 121 (02) : 360 - 371
  • [7] Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders
    Insel, Thomas
    Cuthbert, Bruce
    Garvey, Marjorie
    Heinssen, Robert
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Quinn, Kevin
    Sanislow, Charles
    Wang, Philip
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 167 (07) : 748 - 751
  • [8] Reaction time variability in ADHD: A meta-analytic review of 319 studies
    Kofler, Michael J.
    Rapport, Mark D.
    Sarver, Dustin E.
    Raiker, Joseph S.
    Orban, Sarah A.
    Friedman, Lauren M.
    Kolomeyer, Ellen G.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2013, 33 (06) : 795 - 811
  • [9] THE DIAGNOSIS OF ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER (HYPERKINESIS) IN CHILDREN
    LEVY, F
    HOBBES, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1981, 20 (02) : 376 - 384
  • [10] A CONTINUOUS PERFORMANCE-TEST OF BRAIN-DAMAGE
    ROSVOLD, HE
    MIRSKY, AF
    SARASON, I
    BRANSOME, ED
    BECK, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1956, 20 (05): : 343 - 350