Inclusive education services for children and youth with disabilities: Values, roles and challenges of school leaders

被引:24
作者
Poon-McBrayer, Kim Fong [1 ]
Wong, Ping-man [2 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Inst Educ, Dept Educ Policy & Leadership, Tai Po, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Macao, Fac Educ, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Inclusive education; Relationship-based leadership; Transformational leadership; Confucianism; Christianity; Whole-school approach; HONG-KONG; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; CURRICULUM REFORM; HEADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.009
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Implementing inclusive education requires significant changes to values, systems, and practices. Hong Kong began to implement the inclusive education policy on the basis of voluntary participation in 1997. The government later launched a school partnership scheme, under which schools with proficient practices in whole-school approach to inclusive education were invited to serve as resource schools to support other schools. Data on what has led school leaders to join the reform under the policy of voluntary participation and how they tackle problems during implementation cannot be located. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative study is to uncover the reasons for school leaders' decision to participate in and what they did to facilitate the school wide effort to practice inclusive education, as well as challenges encountered. Key findings included Christianity and Confucianism as the prime reasons for practicing inclusive education, partnership with teachers and a shared vision as the key to successful implementation, and a competitive education system together with inadequate resources and teacher training as the main challenges. Recommendations consist of incorporating value development and building relationships with stakeholders in principal training programs, integrating knowledge and skills for inclusive education into the pre- and in-service teacher training programs, and appropriating resources with increased stability and autonomy. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1520 / 1525
页数:6
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] Equal Opportunities Commission, 2012, EX SUMM STUD EQ LEAR
  • [22] Faure M., 2005, IMPLICATIONS HLTH PR, V47, P40
  • [23] Fullan M., 1991, MEANING ED CHANGE, V2nd
  • [24] Fullan M., 1993, CHANGE FORCES PROBIN
  • [25] Fullan M., 2001, NEW MEANING ED CHANG, V3rd
  • [26] WHO MAKES A GOOD LEADER? COOPERATIVENESS, OPTIMISM, AND LEADING-BY-EXAMPLE
    Gaechter, Simon
    Nosenzo, Daniele
    Renner, Elke
    Sefton, Martin
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2012, 50 (04) : 953 - 967
  • [27] Is modeling enough?
    Goslin, Khym G.
    [J]. PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 2012, 93 (07) : 42 - 45
  • [28] Greenlee B., 2009, Education, V130, P96
  • [29] Halawah I., 2005, EDUCATION, V126, P334
  • [30] Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning
    Hallinger, Philip
    Heck, Ronald H.
    [J]. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (02) : 95 - 110