共 33 条
Correlation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration results by Etest and broth microdilution methods with population analysis profile: lack of Etest overestimation of the MIC
被引:10
作者:
Khatib, R.
[1
]
Riederer, K.
[1
]
Shemes, S.
[1
]
Musta, A. C.
[1
]
Szpunar, S.
[1
]
机构:
[1] St John Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 USA
关键词:
SUSCEPTIBILITY;
DAPTOMYCIN;
HETERORESISTANCE;
TRENDS;
D O I:
10.1007/s10096-012-1811-7
中图分类号:
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号:
100401 ;
摘要:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (V-MICs) are sometimes reported to be higher according to Etest versus broth microdilution (BMD). These observations are often interpreted as an Etest overestimation of the actual MIC. We measured V-MIC of 484 MRSA blood isolates using Etest, BMD, and a modified BMD (M-BMD) with incremental dilutions parallel to the Etest scale, correlated the results with population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC). All MIC tests were done in parallel. The mean V-MIC was comparable (1.83 +/- 0.44 [Etest], 1.88 +/- 0.67 [BMD] and 1.75 +/- 0.57 mg/L [M-BMD]; p = 0.9 [ANOVA]). The V-MICs/PAP-AUC correlation coefficient was 0.555 (Etest), 0.513 (BMD), and 0.586 (M-BMD). Etest MICs were equal (44.2 %), one dilution higher (21.9 %), two dilutions higher (2.5 %), one dilution lower (29.8 %), and two dilutions lower (1.6 %) than BMD MICs and were equal (61.5 %), one dilution higher (28.3 %), two dilutions higher (0.4 %), one dilution lower (9.5 %), and two dilutions lower (0.2 %) than M-BMD MICs. The mean PAP-AUC for Etest vs M-BMD among isolates with similar Etest/M-BMD MIC values was 0.25 +/- 0.15 vs 0.35 +/- 0.13 (p = 0.8), 0.46 +/- 0.16 vs 0.50 +/- 0.17 (p = 0.8), 0.64 +/- 0.19 vs 0.67 +/- 0.21 (p = 0.9), and 0.90 +/- 0.31 vs 0.88 +/- 0.25 (p = 1.0) for isolates with V-MIC of a parts per thousand currency sign1, 1.5, 2, and a parts per thousand yen3 mg/L respectively. These results suggest that Etest might not overestimate V-MIC in comparison to M-BMD or BMD; Etest and M-BMD tests depict comparable PAP-AUC and have a higher correlation with PAP-AUC than the conventional BMD, probably because of the more detailed results. Etest may be more suitable than conventional BMD for MIC outcome assessment because of the more detailed MICs.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条