Correlation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration results by Etest and broth microdilution methods with population analysis profile: lack of Etest overestimation of the MIC

被引:10
作者
Khatib, R. [1 ]
Riederer, K. [1 ]
Shemes, S. [1 ]
Musta, A. C. [1 ]
Szpunar, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] St John Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 USA
关键词
SUSCEPTIBILITY; DAPTOMYCIN; HETERORESISTANCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-012-1811-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (V-MICs) are sometimes reported to be higher according to Etest versus broth microdilution (BMD). These observations are often interpreted as an Etest overestimation of the actual MIC. We measured V-MIC of 484 MRSA blood isolates using Etest, BMD, and a modified BMD (M-BMD) with incremental dilutions parallel to the Etest scale, correlated the results with population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC). All MIC tests were done in parallel. The mean V-MIC was comparable (1.83 +/- 0.44 [Etest], 1.88 +/- 0.67 [BMD] and 1.75 +/- 0.57 mg/L [M-BMD]; p = 0.9 [ANOVA]). The V-MICs/PAP-AUC correlation coefficient was 0.555 (Etest), 0.513 (BMD), and 0.586 (M-BMD). Etest MICs were equal (44.2 %), one dilution higher (21.9 %), two dilutions higher (2.5 %), one dilution lower (29.8 %), and two dilutions lower (1.6 %) than BMD MICs and were equal (61.5 %), one dilution higher (28.3 %), two dilutions higher (0.4 %), one dilution lower (9.5 %), and two dilutions lower (0.2 %) than M-BMD MICs. The mean PAP-AUC for Etest vs M-BMD among isolates with similar Etest/M-BMD MIC values was 0.25 +/- 0.15 vs 0.35 +/- 0.13 (p = 0.8), 0.46 +/- 0.16 vs 0.50 +/- 0.17 (p = 0.8), 0.64 +/- 0.19 vs 0.67 +/- 0.21 (p = 0.9), and 0.90 +/- 0.31 vs 0.88 +/- 0.25 (p = 1.0) for isolates with V-MIC of a parts per thousand currency sign1, 1.5, 2, and a parts per thousand yen3 mg/L respectively. These results suggest that Etest might not overestimate V-MIC in comparison to M-BMD or BMD; Etest and M-BMD tests depict comparable PAP-AUC and have a higher correlation with PAP-AUC than the conventional BMD, probably because of the more detailed results. Etest may be more suitable than conventional BMD for MIC outcome assessment because of the more detailed MICs.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [31] Relationship of Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration to Mortality in Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hospital-Acquired, Ventilator-Associated, or Health-care-Associated Pneumonia
    Hague, Nadia Z.
    Zuniga, Lizbeth Cahuayme
    Peyrani, Paula
    Reyes, Katherine
    Lamerato, Lois
    Moore, Carol L.
    Patel, Shruti
    Allen, Marty
    Peterson, Edward
    Wiemken, Timothy
    Cano, Ennie
    Mangino, Julie E.
    Kett, Daniel H.
    Ramirez, Julio A.
    Zervos, Marcus J.
    [J]. CHEST, 2010, 138 (06) : 1356 - 1362
  • [32] A randomized phase 2B trial of vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations – results of a prematurely terminated study
    Shirin Kalimuddin
    Yvonne F. Z. Chan
    Rachel Phillips
    Siew Pei Ong
    Sophia Archuleta
    David Chien Lye
    Thuan Tong Tan
    Jenny G. H. Low
    [J]. Trials, 19
  • [33] A randomized phase 2B trial of vancomycin versus daptomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia due to isolates with high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations - results of a prematurely terminated study
    Kalimuddi, Shirin
    Chan, Yvonne F. Z.
    Phillips, Rachel
    Ong, Siew Pei
    Archuleta, Sophia
    Lye, David Chien
    Thuan Tong Tan
    Low, Jenny G. H.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2018, 19