Correlation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration results by Etest and broth microdilution methods with population analysis profile: lack of Etest overestimation of the MIC

被引:10
|
作者
Khatib, R. [1 ]
Riederer, K. [1 ]
Shemes, S. [1 ]
Musta, A. C. [1 ]
Szpunar, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] St John Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 USA
关键词
SUSCEPTIBILITY; DAPTOMYCIN; HETERORESISTANCE; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s10096-012-1811-7
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (V-MICs) are sometimes reported to be higher according to Etest versus broth microdilution (BMD). These observations are often interpreted as an Etest overestimation of the actual MIC. We measured V-MIC of 484 MRSA blood isolates using Etest, BMD, and a modified BMD (M-BMD) with incremental dilutions parallel to the Etest scale, correlated the results with population analysis profile-area under the curve (PAP-AUC). All MIC tests were done in parallel. The mean V-MIC was comparable (1.83 +/- 0.44 [Etest], 1.88 +/- 0.67 [BMD] and 1.75 +/- 0.57 mg/L [M-BMD]; p = 0.9 [ANOVA]). The V-MICs/PAP-AUC correlation coefficient was 0.555 (Etest), 0.513 (BMD), and 0.586 (M-BMD). Etest MICs were equal (44.2 %), one dilution higher (21.9 %), two dilutions higher (2.5 %), one dilution lower (29.8 %), and two dilutions lower (1.6 %) than BMD MICs and were equal (61.5 %), one dilution higher (28.3 %), two dilutions higher (0.4 %), one dilution lower (9.5 %), and two dilutions lower (0.2 %) than M-BMD MICs. The mean PAP-AUC for Etest vs M-BMD among isolates with similar Etest/M-BMD MIC values was 0.25 +/- 0.15 vs 0.35 +/- 0.13 (p = 0.8), 0.46 +/- 0.16 vs 0.50 +/- 0.17 (p = 0.8), 0.64 +/- 0.19 vs 0.67 +/- 0.21 (p = 0.9), and 0.90 +/- 0.31 vs 0.88 +/- 0.25 (p = 1.0) for isolates with V-MIC of a parts per thousand currency sign1, 1.5, 2, and a parts per thousand yen3 mg/L respectively. These results suggest that Etest might not overestimate V-MIC in comparison to M-BMD or BMD; Etest and M-BMD tests depict comparable PAP-AUC and have a higher correlation with PAP-AUC than the conventional BMD, probably because of the more detailed results. Etest may be more suitable than conventional BMD for MIC outcome assessment because of the more detailed MICs.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 806
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration results by Etest and broth microdilution methods with population analysis profile: lack of Etest overestimation of the MIC
    R. Khatib
    K. Riederer
    S. Shemes
    A. C. Musta
    S. Szpunar
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2013, 32 : 803 - 806
  • [2] Vancomycin MIC for Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Isolates: Evaluation of the Broth Microdilution and Etest Methods
    Paiva, Rodrigo M.
    Mombach Pinheiro Machado, Alice B.
    Zavascki, Alexandre P.
    Barth, Afonso L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 48 (12) : 4652 - 4654
  • [3] Nine-Hospital Study Comparing Broth Microdilution and Etest Method Results for Vancomycin and Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Sader, Helio S.
    Rhomberg, Paul R.
    Jones, Ronald N.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (07) : 3162 - 3165
  • [4] Evaluation of Vancomycin Susceptibility Testing for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: Comparison of Etest and Three Automated Testing Methods
    Rybak, Michael J.
    Vidaillac, Celine
    Sader, Helio S.
    Rhomberg, Paul R.
    Salimnia, Hossein
    Briski, Lawrence E.
    Wanger, Audrey
    Jones, Ronald N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (07) : 2077 - 2081
  • [5] Determining accurate vancomycin MIC values for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the microdilution method
    Lepe, Jose A.
    Dominguez-Herrera, Juan
    Pachon, Jeronimo
    Aznar, Javier
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 69 (01) : 136 - 138
  • [6] Etest® versus broth microdilution for ceftaroline MIC determination with Staphylococcus aureus: results from PREMIUM, a European multicentre study
    Canton, Rafael
    Livermore, David M.
    Isabel Morosini, Maria
    Diaz-Reganon, Jazmin
    Rossolini, Gian Maria
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2017, 72 (02) : 431 - 436
  • [7] Vancomycin MIC Susceptibility Testing of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates: A Comparison Between Etest® and an Automated Testing Method
    Bland, Christopher M.
    Porr, William H.
    Davis, Kepler A.
    Mansell, Karon B.
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 103 (11) : 1124 - 1128
  • [8] Should Laboratories Test Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus for Elevated Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations by Etest as a Driver of Treatment Changes?
    Humphries, Romney M.
    Hindler, Janet A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 55 (04) : 612 - 613
  • [9] Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Matters
    Deresinski, Stan
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 54 (06) : 772 - 774
  • [10] Vancomycin minimal inhibitory concentration from broth microdilution and Etest in respiratory tract samples of patients with ventilation-associated pneumonia
    Machado, D. P.
    Nagel, F.
    Aquino, V. R.
    Martins, D. de Souza
    Nazario, R.
    Goldani, L. Z.
    dos Santos, R. P.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2010, 76 (02) : 182 - 184