Efficacy of lumbar orthoses after posterior lumbar interbody fusion-a prospective randomized study

被引:8
|
作者
Fujiwara, Hiroyasu [1 ]
Makino, Takahiro [2 ]
Yonenobu, Kazuo [3 ]
Moriguchi, Yu [1 ]
Oda, Takenori [1 ]
Kaito, Takashi [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org Osaka Minami Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[3] Osaka Yukioka Coll Hlth Sci, Osaka, Japan
关键词
Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ); lumbar spine; lumbosacral orthosis; posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTERVERTEBRAL MOBILITY; DEGENERATIVE CONDITIONS; NATURAL-HISTORY; SPINE; IMMOBILIZATION; DEVICE; DISC;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000015183
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Lumbosacral orthoses (LSOs) are used as standard care after lumbar fusion surgery though their efficacy is unknown. The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled study was to elucidate the clinical and radiographic efficacies of LSO treatment in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) of less than 3 segments. Methods: Seventy-three patients who underwent PLIF were randomly allocated to 3 groups: 1 with custom-made LSO with metallic stays (C group); 1 with ready-made LSO without metallic stays (R group), and 1 without LSO (N group). The patients in the C and R groups were instructed to wear LSO postoperatively for 3 months. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA-back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and 100-mm visual analog scale for low back pain. Radiographic evaluation included intervertebral fusion rates and loss of correction postoperatively at 2 years. Results: A significant difference in the clinical outcomes was observed only for the lumbar dysfunction domain of JOABPEQ postoperatively at 1 month (N vs C groups; 45% vs 10%, P=.03). Radiographic outcomes were not different between the groups. Conclusions: No effect of orthosis treatment for less than 3 segments in PLIF was observed on clinical and radiographic outcomes. The type of orthosis also did not influence the outcomes. These results suggest that the use of LSO for PLIF can be simplified or is omissible except in patients with severe osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion and modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease
    Liu, Zhengping
    Wang, Siyu
    Li, Tao
    Chen, Si
    Li, Ying
    Xie, Wei
    Tang, Jin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [2] Comparison of Clinical Efficacy in the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease: Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, and Hybrid Surgery
    Zhu, Zhenbiao
    Xuan, Anwu
    Xu, Cheng
    Wang, Chaofeng
    He, Qing
    Tang, Liang
    Ruan, Dike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 18 (06) : 756 - 768
  • [3] Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Dynamic Hybrid Instrumentation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
    Herren, Christian
    Simons, Raoul M.
    Bredow, Jan
    Oikonomidis, Stavros
    Westermann, Leonard
    Sobottke, Rolf
    Scheyerer, Max J.
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    Eysel, Peer
    Zarghooni, Kourosh
    Franklin, Jeremy
    Siewe, Jan
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 117 : E228 - E237
  • [4] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and segmental lumbar lordosis
    Kakkar, Rahul
    Sirigiri, P. B. R.
    Howieson, A.
    Raman, A. Siva
    Crawford, R. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) : 125 - 129
  • [5] The efficacy and safety of decompression with interspinous fixation for lumbar spondylolisthesis when compared with posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A pilot study
    Jung, Seong-Chan
    Jung, Ji-Ho
    Hong, Jong-Hwan
    Han, Moon-Soo
    Lee, Shin-Seok
    Lee, Jung-Kil
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (24) : e38501
  • [6] Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability
    Sakeb, Najmus
    Ahsan, Kamrul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 47 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [7] Salvage Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Pseudoarthrosis After Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 10 Patients
    Yun, Dong-Ju
    Yu, Jae-Won
    Jeon, Sang-Hyeop
    Lee, Hyung-Chang
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 111 : E746 - E755
  • [8] A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF)
    Rathbone, John
    Rackham, Matthew
    Nielsen, David
    Lee, So Mang
    Hing, Wayne
    Riar, Sukhman
    Scott-Young, Matthew
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 32 (06) : 1911 - 1926
  • [9] Axial Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Prospective Monocentric Study
    Stulik, J.
    Adamek, S.
    Barna, M.
    Kasprikova, N.
    Polanecky, O.
    Kryl, J.
    ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2014, 81 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [10] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26