Comparison of four different categories of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees

被引:33
作者
Agrawal, Vibhor [1 ,2 ]
Gailey, Robert S. [1 ,2 ]
Gaunaurd, Ignacio A. [1 ,2 ]
O'Toole, Christopher [3 ]
Finnieston, Adam [4 ]
Tolchin, Ronald [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Phys Therapy, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] Miami Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Res Dept, Miami, FL USA
[3] Miami Project Cure Paralysis, Miami, FL USA
[4] Arthur Finnieston Prosthet & Orthot, Miami, FL USA
[5] Baptist Hosp Miami, Ctr Neurosci, Spine Ctr, Miami, FL USA
关键词
Biomechanics of prosthetic; orthotic devices; biomechanics; gait analysis; gait; prosthetic feet; prosthetics; physiotherapy; rehabilitation; FOOT; GAIT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; COMPONENTS; SYMMETRY;
D O I
10.1177/0309364614536762
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Comparative effectiveness of prosthetic feet during ramp ambulation in unilateral transtibial amputees, who function at different Medicare Functional Classification Levels, has not been published. Objective: To determine differences in symmetry in external work between four categories of prosthetic feet in K-Level-2 and K-Level-3 unilateral transtibial amputees during ramp ascent and descent. Study design: Randomized repeated-measures trial. Methods: Ten subjects completed six testing sessions during which symmetry in external work was calculated using F-scan in-sole sensors. Between testing sessions 1 and 2, subjects received standardized functional prosthetic training. In Sessions 3-6, subjects tested four feetsolid ankle cushion heel, stationary attachment flexible endoskeleton, Talux (categories K1, K2, and K3, respectively), and Proprio-Foot (microprocessor ankle)using a study socket and had a 10- to 14-day accommodation period with each foot. Results: During ramp descent, K-Level-2 subjects demonstrated higher symmetry in external work values with Talux and Proprio-Foot compared to the solid ankle cushion heel foot. K-Level-3 subjects also had higher symmetry in external work values with the Talux foot than the solid ankle cushion heel foot. Ramp ascent symmetry in external work values were not significantly different between feet. Conclusions: Prosthetic foot category appears to influence symmetry in external work more during decline walking than incline walking. K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees achieve greater symmetry from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle and microprocessor ankles while descending ramps. Clinical relevance The findings suggest that K-Level-2 unilateral transtibial amputees benefit from K3 dynamic response prosthetic feet with J-shaped ankle. These results support the prescription of K3 feet for K-Level-2 amputees who frequently negotiate ramps.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 389
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Comparison between microprocessor-controlled ankle/foot and conventional prosthetic feet during stair negotiation in people with unilateral transtibial amputation [J].
Agrawal, Vibhor ;
Gailey, Robert S. ;
Gaunaurd, Ignacio A. ;
O'Toole, Christopher ;
Finnieston, Adam A. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 50 (07) :941-950
[2]   Influence of gait training and prosthetic foot category on external work symmetry during unilateral transtibial amputee gait [J].
Agrawal, Vibhor ;
Gailey, Robert ;
O'Toole, Christopher ;
Gaunaurd, Ignacio ;
Finnieston, Adam .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 37 (05) :396-403
[3]   Symmetry in External Work (SEW): A novel method of quantifying gait differences between prosthetic feet [J].
Agrawal, Vibhor ;
Gailey, Robert ;
O'Toole, Christopher ;
Gaunaurd, Ignacio ;
Dowell, Tomas .
PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 33 (02) :148-156
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HCFA COMMON PROCEDUR
[5]   Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system [J].
Fradet, Laetitia ;
Alimusaj, Merkur ;
Braatz, Frank ;
Wolf, Sebastian I. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 32 (02) :191-198
[6]   Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use [J].
Gailey, Robert ;
Allen, Kerry ;
Castles, Julie ;
Kucharik, Jennifer ;
Roeder, Mariah .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 45 (01) :15-29
[7]   BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTHETIC FEET ON BELOW-KNEE AMPUTEE WALKING [J].
GITTER, A ;
CZERNIECKI, JM ;
DEGROOT, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1991, 70 (03) :142-148
[8]   Energy storage and return prostheses: does patient perception correlate with biomechanical analysis? [J].
Hafner, BJ ;
Sanders, JE ;
Czerniecki, J ;
Fergason, J .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (05) :325-344
[9]   IN-SHOE PLANTAR MEASUREMENT WITH TEKSCAN SENSOR SYSTEM [J].
KOCH, M .
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 1993, 38 (10) :243-248
[10]  
Macfarlane P.A., 1991, J PROSTHET ORTHOT, V3, P114