Assessing the accuracy of blending Landsat-MODIS surface reflectances in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal dynamics: A framework for algorithm selection

被引:312
作者
Emelyanova, Irina V. [1 ]
McVicar, Tim R. [2 ]
Van Niel, Thomas G. [1 ]
Li, Ling Tao [2 ]
van Dijk, Albert I. J. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia
[2] CSIRO Land & Water, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
Landsat-MODIS blending; Spatial-temporal variance; STARFM; ESTARFM; Fusion; TIME-SERIES; SATELLITE IMAGERY; FUSION MODEL; FIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; PHENOLOGY; DISCRIMINATION; CLASSIFICATION; DIMENSIONALITY; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2013.02.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Blending algorithms model land cover change by using highly resolved spatial data from one sensor and highly resolved temporal data from another. Because the data are not usually observed concurrently, unaccounted spatial and temporal variances cause error in blending algorithms, yet, to date, there has been no definitive assessment of algorithm performance against spatial and temporal variances. Our objectives were to: (i) evaluate the accuracy of two advanced blending algorithms (STARFM and ESTARFM) and two simple benchmarking algorithms in two landscapes with contrasting spatial and temporal variances; and (ii) synthesise the spatial and temporal conditions under which the algorithms performed best. Landsat-like images were simulated on 27 dates in total using the nearest temporal cloud-free Landsat-MODIS pairs to the simulation date, one before and one after. RMSD, bias, and r(2) estimates between simulated and observed Landsat images were calculated, and overall variance of Landsat and MODIS datasets were partitioned into spatial and temporal components. Assessment was performed over the whole study site, and for specific land covers. Results addressing objective (i) were that: ESTARFM did not always produce lower errors than STARFM; STARFM and ESTARFM did not always produce lower errors than simple benchmarking algorithms; and land cover spatial and temporal variances were strongly associated with algorithm performance. Results addressing objective (ii) indicated ESTARFM was superior where/when spatial variance was dominant; and STARFM was superior where/when temporal variance was dominant. We proposed a framework for selecting blending algorithms based on partitioning variance into the spatial and temporal components and suggested that comparing Landsat and MODIS spatial and temporal variances was a practical method to determine if, and when, MODIS could add value for blending. Crown Copyright (c) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 209
页数:17
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Mapping daily evapotranspiration at field to continental scales using geostationary and polar orbiting satellite imagery
    Anderson, M. C.
    Kustas, W. P.
    Norman, J. M.
    Hain, C. R.
    Mecikalski, J. R.
    Schultz, L.
    Gonzalez-Dugo, M. P.
    Cammalleri, C.
    d'Urso, G.
    Pimstein, A.
    Gao, F.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (01) : 223 - 239
  • [2] Berk A., 1999, Proceedings of SPIE Optical Spectroscopic Techniques and Instrumentation for Atmospheric and Space Research
  • [3] Preparing Landsat Image Time Series (LITS) for Monitoring Changes in Vegetation Phenology in Queensland, Australia
    Bhandari, Santosh
    Phinn, Stuart
    Gill, Tony
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 4 (06) : 1856 - 1886
  • [4] A data-model fusion approach for upscaling gross ecosystem productivity to the landscape scale based on remote sensing and flux footprint modelling
    Chen, B.
    Ge, Q.
    Fu, D.
    Yu, G.
    Sun, X.
    Wang, S.
    Wang, H.
    [J]. BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2010, 7 (09) : 2943 - 2958
  • [5] Linking ground-based to satellite-derived phenological metrics in support of habitat assessment
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Hilker, Thomas
    Bater, Christopher W.
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Nielsen, Scott E.
    McDermid, Greg
    Stenhouse, Gordon
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2012, 3 (03) : 191 - 200
  • [6] COMPARISONS OF THE DIMENSIONALITY AND FEATURES OF SIMULATED LANDSAT-4 MSS AND TM DATA
    CRIST, EP
    CICONE, RC
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 14 (1-3) : 235 - 246
  • [7] Emelyanova I.V., 2012, BLENDING LANDSAT MOD
  • [8] On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: Predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance
    Gao, Feng
    Masek, Jeff
    Schwaller, Matt
    Hall, Forrest
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (08): : 2207 - 2218
  • [9] Characterizing stand-replacing disturbance in western Alberta grizzly bear habitat, using a satellite-derived high temporal and spatial resolution change sequence
    Gaulton, Rachel
    Hilker, Thomas
    Wulder, Michael A.
    Coops, Nicholas C.
    Stenhouse, Gordon
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 261 (04) : 865 - 877
  • [10] Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations
    Heinsch, Faith Ann
    Zhao, Maosheng
    Running, Steven W.
    Kimball, John S.
    Nemani, Ramakrishna R.
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    Bolstad, Paul V.
    Cook, Bruce D.
    Desai, Ankur R.
    Ricciuto, Daniel M.
    Law, Beverly E.
    Oechel, Walter C.
    Kwon, Hyojung
    Luo, Hongyan
    Wofsy, Steven C.
    Dunn, Allison L.
    Munger, J. William
    Baldocchi, Dennis D.
    Xu, Liukang
    Hollinger, David Y.
    Richardson, Andrew D.
    Stoy, Paul C.
    Siqueira, Mario B. S.
    Monson, Russell K.
    Burns, Sean P.
    Flanagan, Lawrence B.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (07): : 1908 - 1925