An Improved Source Model of the 2021 Mw 6.1 Yangbi Earthquake (Southwest China) Based on InSAR and BOI Datasets

被引:4
|
作者
Lu, Hao [1 ]
Feng, Guangcai [1 ]
He, Lijia [1 ]
Liu, Jihong [1 ]
Gao, Hua [2 ]
Wang, Yuedong [1 ]
Wu, Xiongxiao [3 ]
Wang, Yuexin [1 ]
An, Qi [1 ]
Zhao, Yingang [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Geosci & Infophys, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Normal Univ, Sch Geog & Environm, Nanchang 330022, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Land Resources Survey & Mapping Inst, Guangzhou 510599, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yangbi earthquake; InSAR; BOI; coseismic slip; SURFACE DEFORMATION; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; DISPLACEMENT; CALIFORNIA; INVERSION; RADAR; FAULT;
D O I
10.3390/rs14194804
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The azimuth displacement derived by pixel offset tracking (POT) or multiple aperture InSAR (MAI) measurements is usually used to characterize the north-south coseismic deformation caused by large earthquakes (M > 6.5), but its application in the source parameter inversion of moderate-magnitude earthquakes (similar to M 6.0) is rare due to the insensitive observation accuracy. Conventional line-of-sight (LOS) displacements derived by the Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) have limited ability to constrain the source parameters of the earthquake with near north-south striking. On 21 May 2021, an M-w 6.1 near north-south striking earthquake occurred in Yangbi County, Yunnan Province, China. In this study, we derive both the coseismic LOS displacement and the burst overlap interferometry (BOI) displacement from the Sentinel-1 data to constrain the source model of this event. We construct a single-segment fault geometry and estimate the coseismic slip distribution by inverting the derived LOS and BOI-derived azimuth displacements. Inversion results show that adding the BOI-derived azimuth displacements to source modeling can improve the resolution of the slip model by similar to 15% compared with using the LOS displacements only. The coseismic slip is mainly distributed 2 to 11 km deep, with a maximum slip of approximately 1.1 m. Coulomb stress calculation shows a maximum Coulomb stress increment of similar to 0.05 Mpa at the north-central sub-region of the Red River Fault. In addition, there is a small Coulomb stress increase at the Southern end of the Weixi-Weishan fault. The potential seismic risks on the Weixi-Weishan and Northwest section of the Red River faults should be continuously monitored.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Source Model for the 2022 Qinghai Menyuan Ms 6.9 Earthquake Based on D-InSAR
    Liao, Jiangtao
    Liang, Chuntao
    Wang, Chaoliang
    Cao, Feihuang
    Ye, Chengming
    Yang, Yinghui
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [22] Source parameters of the 8 February 2016, Mw=4.2 Los Humeros earthquake by the inversion of InSAR-based ground deformation
    Bekesi, Eszter
    Fokker, Peter A.
    Martins, Joana E.
    Norini, Gianluca
    Van Wees, Jan-Diederik
    GEOTHERMICS, 2021, 94 (94)
  • [23] Source model for the Mw 6.0 earthquake in Jiashi, China on 19 January 2020 from Sentinel-1A InSAR data
    Pengfei Yu
    Xuejun Qiao
    Wei Xiong
    Wei Chen
    Zhaosheng Nie
    Dijin Wang
    Zhige Jia
    Jie Li
    Earth, Planets and Space, 72
  • [24] Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo, China, Earthquake Inferred from InSAR Measurements and Relocated Aftershocks
    He, Kefeng
    Wen, Yangmao
    Xu, Caijun
    Zhao, Yingwen
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 93 (01) : 8 - 20
  • [25] Ground Deformation and Source Fault Model of the Mw 5.7 Xegar (Tibetan Plateau) 2020 Earthquake, Based on InSAR Observation
    Li, Chengtao
    Li, Qi
    Tan, Kai
    Huang, Yong
    Lu, Xiaofei
    PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2022, 179 (10) : 3589 - 3603
  • [26] Source Model and Triggered Aseismic Faulting of the 2021 Mw 7.3 Maduo Earthquake Revealed by the UAV-Lidar/Photogrammetry, InSAR, and Field Investigation
    Yang, Ying-Hui
    Xu, Qiang
    Hu, Jyr-Ching
    Wang, Yun-Sheng
    Dong, Xiu-Jun
    Chen, Qiang
    Zhang, Yi-Jun
    Li, Hao-Liang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [27] The Tectonic Significance of the Mw7.1 Earthquake Source Model in Tibet in 2025 Constrained by InSAR Data
    Yu, Shuyuan
    Zhang, Shubi
    Luo, Jiaji
    Li, Zhejun
    Ding, Juan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 17 (05)
  • [28] Source Geometry and Causes of the 2019 Ms6.0 Changning Earthquake in Sichuan, China Based on InSAR
    Gao, Hua
    Liao, Mingsheng
    Liu, Xiaoge
    Xu, Wenbin
    Fang, Nan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [29] Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Fatalities in Mainland China Based on Physical Simulation and Empirical Statistics-A Case Study of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake
    Li, Yilong
    Zhang, Zhenguo
    Wang, Wenqiang
    Feng, Xuping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [30] Source model of the 2018 MW7.5 Papua New Guinea earthquake constrained by InSAR measurements: Insight into a blind rupture beneath the New Guinea Highlands
    Chen, Wei
    Sheng, Tianchen
    Xiong, Wei
    GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2024, 15 (04) : 315 - 325