Decision making with uncertainty: an example of water treatment approach selection

被引:9
作者
Chowdhury, Shakhawat [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
来源
WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA | 2012年 / 47卷 / 02期
关键词
decision making; fuzzy aggregation; fuzzy priority matrix; uncertainty; TREATMENT-PLANT DESIGN; DRINKING-WATER; RISK; PRECURSORS;
D O I
10.2166/wqrjc.2012.107
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Decision makers often encounter uncertainty in selecting the best available option. Fuzzy multicriteria decision making aggregates different basic criteria through a hierarchy structure. This aggregation combines fuzzy assessment and priority matrices. When available data are imprecise, the assessment and priority matrices for different hierarchy level criteria are developed from expert judgments. In fuzzy aggregation, uncertainties in the assessment matrix are captured with fuzzy membership functions. The priority matrix is developed through pairwise comparison, in which the relative importance of the criteria is represented in crisp values; thus uncertainties associated with priority assignments are not incorporated in traditional fuzzy aggregation. This paper presents the application of a methodology to incorporate fuzziness in developing a priority matrix for environmental decision making. Fuzzy alpha-cut technique for different confidence intervals has been incorporated. The gradient eigenvector method has been followed to obtain consistency in constructing the priority matrix for different hierarchy level criteria. The max-min paired elimination method for hierarchical aggregation has been used to obtain the final fuzzy set. A case study for drinking water treatment technology evaluation is performed to present the potential environmental application of this approach, leading to the identification of the best treatment technology.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 165
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [12] Comparing two methods for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments
    Guyonnet, D
    Côme, B
    Perrochet, P
    Parriaux, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1999, 125 (07): : 660 - 666
  • [13] Klir G, 1995, FUZZY SETS FUZZY LOG, V4
  • [14] Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development
    Lee, HM
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1996, 79 (03) : 323 - 336
  • [15] Decision of water supply line under uncertainty
    Lee, YW
    Bogardi, I
    Kim, JH
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (13) : 3371 - 3379
  • [16] MOE (Ministry of the Environment), 2007, Drinking Water Surveillance Program (DWSP) Summary Report for 2000-2004
  • [17] RECKHOW DA, 1984, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V76, P151
  • [18] Saaty T.L., 1988, Multi-criteria decision making: The analytical hierarchy process
  • [19] Takahashi S., 2010, Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, V10, P31, DOI 10.2166/ws.2010.906
  • [20] By-products formation during drinking water disinfection: A tool to assess disinfection efficiency?
    Von Gunten, U
    Driedger, A
    Gallard, H
    Salhi, E
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (08) : 2095 - 2099