Healthcare decision-making applications using multicriteria decision analysis: A scoping review

被引:46
|
作者
Glaize, Annabelle [1 ]
Duenas, Alejandra [2 ]
Di Martinelly, Christine [1 ]
Fagnot, Isabelle [3 ]
机构
[1] IESEG Sch Management, LEM CNRS UMR 9221, Management Dept, Lille, France
[2] CERFIGE, ICN Business Sch, Business Environm, Nancy, France
[3] Audencia Business Sch, Management Dept, Nantes, France
关键词
applications; healthcare areas; MCDA; methods; multicriteria decision analysis; scoping review; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; BENEFIT-RISK-ASSESSMENT; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; ANALYSIS MCDA; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; EVIDEM FRAMEWORK; CANCER-TREATMENT; RARE DISEASES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1002/mcda.1659
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The objective of this study is to review applications of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods to provide structure for and practical insights on how MCDA methods are applied in different healthcare areas. Four databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and PubMed) were searched from 1980 to February 7, 2018. A scoping review was performed to outline the most frequently applied MCDA methods, in which only case studies were considered, as the objective was to assess the applications of MCDA methods. Seventy case studies were selected. The review showed that the first real-life application was published in 1990. With regard to areas of application, three aspects were analysed: type of health services (public or private), type of intervention (preventive, diagnostic, or treatment), and healthcare area (policymaking; resource allocation; health technology assessment; pharmaceutics; and hospital, clinical, or patient level). Data revealed that MCDA was principally used in public health services (n = 59). Three types of interventions were identified: prevention (n = 36), diagnosis (n = 32), and treatment (n = 2). An MCDA process of application was then followed to provide practical insights. During the problem-structuring phase, results showed that processes for selecting stakeholders and criteria differed among healthcare areas. For model building, authors preferred value measurement methods and especially the analytical hierarchy process. Authors of the 70 case studies included and confirmed the usefulness of MCDA in different healthcare contexts. The stakeholders, criteria, and MCDA methods chosen differ from one study to another, answering different research objectives in different healthcare areas. This scoping review highlights the importance of each MCDA step (using Belton and Stewart's framework), from problem structuring (including the selection of stakeholders) to the model building phase (encompassing the selection of the appropriate MCDA method). We recommend structured and justified analysis so that decision makers and stakeholders can feel confident during the application process in order to make final decisions more meaningful. Further work is needed to help researchers and decision makers when choosing a suitable MCDA method.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 83
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Decision Making in Healthcare: An Updated Systematic Literature Review
    Gongora-Salazar, Pamela
    Rocks, Stephen
    Fahr, Patrick
    Rivero-Arias, Oliver
    Tsiachristas, Apostolos
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (05) : 780 - 790
  • [2] Multicriteria decision analysis in oncology
    Adunlin, Georges
    Diaby, Vakaramoko
    Montero, Alberto J.
    Xiao, Hong
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 1812 - 1826
  • [3] More work needed on decision analysis for shared decision-making: A scoping review
    Humphries, Brittany
    Leon-Garcia, Montserrat
    Quispe, Ena Nino de Guzman
    Canelo-Aybar, Carlos
    Valli, Claudia
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Mirabi, Susan
    Eckman, Mark H.
    Guyatt, Gordon
    Bates, Shannon M.
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Xie, Feng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 141 : 106 - 120
  • [4] International experiences in multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) for evaluating orphan drugs: a scoping review
    Lasalvia, P.
    Prieto-Pinto, L.
    Moreno, M.
    Castrillon, J.
    Romano, G.
    Garzon-Orjuela, N.
    Rosselli, D.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (04) : 409 - 420
  • [5] Knowledge Mapping of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Dai, Zeqi
    Xu, Simin
    Wu, Xue
    Hu, Ruixue
    Li, Huimin
    He, Haoqiang
    Hu, Jing
    Liao, Xing
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [6] Multicriteria decision analysis in health care decision in oncology: a systematic review
    Campolina, Alessandro Goncalves
    Suzumura, Erica Aranha
    Quan Nha Hong
    de Soarez, Patricia Coelho
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (03) : 365 - 380
  • [7] A comprehensive review on applications of multicriteria decision-making methods in power and energy systems
    Bohra, Shabbir S.
    Anvari-Moghaddam, Amjad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (04) : 4088 - 4118
  • [8] Can reflective multicriteria be the new paradigm for healthcare decision-making? The EVIDEM journey
    Goetghebeur, Mireille M.
    Cellier, Marjo S.
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [9] Capturing social impacts for decision-making: a Multicriteria Decision Analysis perspective
    Estevez, Rodrigo A.
    Walshe, Terry
    Burgman, Mark A.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2013, 19 (5-6) : 608 - 616
  • [10] Outline of multicriteria decision-making in green logistics
    Watrobski, Jaroslaw
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE GREEN CITIES - GREEN LOGISTICS FOR GREENER CITIES, 2016, 16 : 537 - 552