Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study

被引:68
作者
Ali, Liaqat [1 ,2 ]
Asadi, Mohsen [1 ,2 ]
Gasevic, Dragan [1 ,2 ]
Jovanovic, Jelena [3 ]
Hatala, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada
[2] Athabasca Univ, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade 11001, Serbia
关键词
quantitative evaluation; E-learning; Feedback; Learning analytics; LAAM; Ontologies; MODELING GRAMMARS; SUPPORT TEACHERS; USER ACCEPTANCE; NOTE-TAKING; TECHNOLOGY; ANNOTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.023
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Present research and development offer various learning analytics tools providing insights into different aspects of learning processes. Adoption of a specific tool for practice is based on how its learning analytics are perceived by educators to support their pedagogical and organizational goals. In this paper, we propose and empirically validate a Learning Analytics Acceptance Model (LAAM) of factors influencing the beliefs of educators concerning the adoption a learning analytics tool. In particular, our model explains how the usage beliefs (i.e., ease-of-use and usefulness perceptions) about the learning analytics of a tool are associated with the intention to adopt the tool. In our study, we considered several factors that could potentially affect the adoption beliefs: i) pedagogical knowledge and information design skills of educators; ii) educators' perceived utility of a learning analytics tool; and iii) educators' perceived ease-of-use of a learning analytics tool. By following the principles of Technology Acceptance Model, the study is done with a sample of educators who experimented with a LOCO-Analyst tool. Our study also determined specific analytics types that are primary antecedence of perceived usefulness (concept comprehension and social interaction) and ease-of-use (interactive visualization). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 148
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recker J, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P57
  • [42] Continued use of process modeling grammars: the impact of individual difference factors
    Recker, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2010, 19 (01) : 76 - 92
  • [43] Signaling, notetaking, and field independence-dependence in text comprehension and recall
    Rickards, JP
    Fajen, BR
    Sullivan, JF
    Gillespie, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 89 (03) : 508 - 517
  • [44] Rinehart S.D., 1993, Reading Research and Introduction, V32, P24, DOI DOI 10.1080/19388079309558130
  • [45] Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension
    Slotte, V
    Lonka, K
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 24 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [46] User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view
    Venkatesh, V
    Morris, MG
    Davis, GB
    Davis, FD
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2003, 27 (03) : 425 - 478
  • [47] Warkentin M., 2002, Electronic Markets, V12, P157, DOI 10.1080/101967802320245929
  • [48] Willging P. A., 2005, US CHINA ED REV, V2, P46
  • [49] Yogesh M., 1999, P 32 ANN HAW INT C S, V1, P1006
  • [50] Zinn C, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4227, P437