Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study

被引:68
作者
Ali, Liaqat [1 ,2 ]
Asadi, Mohsen [1 ,2 ]
Gasevic, Dragan [1 ,2 ]
Jovanovic, Jelena [3 ]
Hatala, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Surrey, BC V3T 0A3, Canada
[2] Athabasca Univ, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Belgrade, Belgrade 11001, Serbia
关键词
quantitative evaluation; E-learning; Feedback; Learning analytics; LAAM; Ontologies; MODELING GRAMMARS; SUPPORT TEACHERS; USER ACCEPTANCE; NOTE-TAKING; TECHNOLOGY; ANNOTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.023
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Present research and development offer various learning analytics tools providing insights into different aspects of learning processes. Adoption of a specific tool for practice is based on how its learning analytics are perceived by educators to support their pedagogical and organizational goals. In this paper, we propose and empirically validate a Learning Analytics Acceptance Model (LAAM) of factors influencing the beliefs of educators concerning the adoption a learning analytics tool. In particular, our model explains how the usage beliefs (i.e., ease-of-use and usefulness perceptions) about the learning analytics of a tool are associated with the intention to adopt the tool. In our study, we considered several factors that could potentially affect the adoption beliefs: i) pedagogical knowledge and information design skills of educators; ii) educators' perceived utility of a learning analytics tool; and iii) educators' perceived ease-of-use of a learning analytics tool. By following the principles of Technology Acceptance Model, the study is done with a sample of educators who experimented with a LOCO-Analyst tool. Our study also determined specific analytics types that are primary antecedence of perceived usefulness (concept comprehension and social interaction) and ease-of-use (interactive visualization). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 148
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   A qualitative evaluation of evolution of a learning analytics tool [J].
Ali, Liaqat ;
Hatala, Marek ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Jovanovic, Jelena .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (01) :470-489
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ANAL QUANTITATIVE DA
[3]  
Attwell G., 2007, ELEARNING PAPERS, V2
[4]   WHAT IS LEARNED IN NOTE TAKING [J].
BARNETT, JE ;
DIVESTA, FJ ;
ROGOZINSKI, JT .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :181-192
[5]  
Bratt S., 2007, World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (ELEARN), Quebec City, Canada, P218
[6]  
Bratt S, 2009, DEV INSTRUMENT ASSES
[7]  
Bratt S, 2009, WORLD C E LEARN CORP, P218
[8]  
Bratt S., 2009, INT C INF COMM TECHN
[9]   NOTE-TAKING AND PASSAGE STYLE [J].
BRETZING, BH ;
KULHAVY, RW .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 73 (02) :242-250
[10]  
Carifio J., 1978, Career Education Quarterly, V3, P34