Influence of Implant Length and Diameter, Bicortical Anchorage, and Sinus Augmentation on Bone Stress Distribution: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

被引:22
作者
Moriwaki, Hiroyoshi [1 ]
Yamaguchi, Satoshi [2 ]
Nakano, Tamaki [1 ]
Yamanishi, Yasufumi [1 ]
Imazato, Satoshi [2 ]
Yatani, Hirofumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Osaka, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Dent, Dept Biomat Sci, Osaka 5650871, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
biomechanics; dental implants; finite element analysis; sinus floor augmentation; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; LATERALIZATION; PLACEMENT; MAXILLA;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.4217
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Clarification of the protocol for using short implants is required to enable widespread use of short implants as an available treatment option. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influences of implant length and diameter, bicortical anchorage, and sinus augmentation on peri-implant cortical bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: For bone models with bone quantity A and C in the maxillary molar region, three-dimensional finite element analysis was performed using different lengths and diameters of implant computer-aided design models, and the degree of maximum principal stress distribution for each model was calculated. Results: For bone quantity A models, the degree of stress distribution of the 4-mm-diameter, 6-mm-length implant was the greatest. For bone quantity C models, the degree of stress distribution of the 5-mm-diameter, 6-mm-length implant with bicortical anchorage was much smaller than that for the 4-mm-diameter, 13-mm-length implant with sinus augmentation. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that 6-mm-length implants should be selected in cases with bone quantity C where the bone width permits increasing implant diameter from 4 mm to 5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:E84 / E91
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis [J].
Abu-Hammad, Osama ;
Khraisat, Ameen ;
Dar-Odeh, Najla ;
El-Maaytah, Mohammed .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, 9 (04) :217-221
[2]   Short Implants: A Descriptive Study of 273 Implants [J].
Angels Sanchez-Garces, M. ;
Costa-Berenguer, Xavier ;
Gay-Escoda, Cosme .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (04) :508-516
[3]   Short Implants in Maxillae and Mandibles: A Retrospective Study With 1 to 8 Years of Follow-Up [J].
Anitua, Eduardo ;
Orive, Gorka .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 81 (06) :819-826
[4]  
Bedrossian E, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P853
[5]  
Boyne Philip J, 2004, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, V16, P19, DOI 10.1016/j.coms.2003.10.006
[6]   Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method [J].
Bulaqi, Haddad Arabi ;
Mashhadi, Mahmoud Mousavi ;
Geramipanah, Farideh ;
Safari, Hamed ;
Paknejad, Mojgan .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2015, 113 (05) :405-411
[7]   Basic surgical principles with ITI implants [J].
Buser, D ;
von Arx, T ;
ten Bruggenkate, C ;
Weingart, D .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2000, 11 :59-68
[8]  
Chang Shih-Hao, 2012, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V27, pe102
[9]  
das Neves FD, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P86
[10]   Effect of Diameter and Length on Stress Distribution of the Alveolar Crest around Immediate Loading Implants [J].
Ding, Xi ;
Liao, Sheng-Hui ;
Zhu, Xing-Hao ;
Zhang, Xiu-Hua ;
Zhang, Lin .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (04) :279-287