The value of the value of information

被引:21
作者
Dakins, ME [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Idaho Falls, ID 83402 USA
来源
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT | 1999年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
expected value of including uncertainty; expected value of perfect information; expected value of sample information;
D O I
10.1080/10807039991289437
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
An important application of decision analysis is determining the value that information has to a decision maker. The expected value of information (EVOI) is the expected increase in the value (or decrease in the loss) associated with obtaining more information about quantities relevant to the decision process. The EVOI call be thought of as a measure of the importance of the uncertainty about a quantity in terms of the expected improvement in the decision that might be obtained from having additional information about it. Examples of EVOI quantities useful in risk management situations include the expected value of including uncertainty (EVIU), the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), and the expected value of sample information (EVSI). Value of information (VOI) analysis is useful because it makes the losses associated with decision errors explicit, balances competing probabilities and costs, helps identify the decision alternative that minimizes the expected loss, prioritizes spending on research, quantifies the value of the research to the decision maker, and provides an upper bound on what should be spent on getting information.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 289
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MANAGERIAL DECISIONS
[2]  
Clemen R., 1996, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis
[3]   RISK-BASED ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION - DECISION FRAMEWORK AND ROLE OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
DAKINS, ME ;
TOLL, JE ;
SMALL, MJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1994, 13 (12) :1907-1915
[4]   Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information [J].
Dakins, ME ;
Toll, JE ;
Small, MJ ;
Brand, KP .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1996, 16 (01) :67-79
[5]   EVALUATING THE BENEFITS OF UNCERTAINTY REDUCTION IN ENVIRONMENTAL-HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT [J].
FINKEL, AM ;
EVANS, JS .
JAPCA-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT, 1987, 37 (10) :1164-1171
[6]   ON A MEASURE OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY AN EXPERIMENT [J].
LINDLEY, DV .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1956, 27 (04) :986-1005
[7]  
MORGAN MG, 1990, UNCERTAINTY GUIDE DE
[8]   BAYESIAN METHODS FOR MODEL UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS WITH APPLICATION TO FUTURE SEA-LEVEL RISE [J].
PATWARDHAN, A ;
SMALL, MJ .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (04) :513-523
[9]  
Raiffa Howard, 1968, Decision Analysis, Introductory Lectures on Choices under Uncertainty
[10]   ASSESSING THE VALUE OF HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION FOR RISK-BASED REMEDIAL ACTION DECISIONS [J].
REICHARD, EG ;
EVANS, JS .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1989, 25 (07) :1451-1460