Cross Calibration of the OceanSAT-2 Scatterometer With QuikSCAT Scatterometer Using Natural Terrestrial Targets

被引:31
作者
Bhowmick, Suchandra Aich [1 ]
Kumar, Raj [1 ]
Kumar, A. S. Kiran [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Space Res Org, Ctr Space Applicat, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2014年 / 52卷 / 06期
关键词
Cross calibration; natural targets; OceanSAT-2 Scatterometer (OSCAT); Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) backscatter; SPACEBORNE SCATTEROMETERS; LAND TARGETS; SEAWINDS;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2013.2272738
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The accuracy of ocean surface wind vectors measured by satellite-borne scatterometers depends on measured backscattering coefficient (sigma degrees). Hence, an in-flight calibration of a satellite scatterometer is essential as this is not guaranteed by its prelaunch absolute calibration. The postlaunch calibration of sigma degrees is also required to monitor the time evolution of the accuracy of measured sigma degrees. This is performed using relative calibration over land targets with minor spatiotemporal variation of sigma degrees. A few such targets are the Amazon rainforest, Greenland, Antarctica, etc. In this paper, relative calibration of sigma degrees from the OceanSAT-2 Scatterometer (OSCAT) has been carried out by comparing it with a similar quantity fromthe Quick Scatterometer (QuikSCAT) for November 2009. The differences between the average sigma degrees of QuikSCAT and that of OSCAT have been calculated globally to check the overall consistency. Over the calibration sites, the differences are within +/- 0.25 dB. Histograms of differences in ascending/descending passes and fore/aft looks of OSCAT have also been analyzed over the calibration sites. These indicate that look bias in OSCAT degrees sigma is within the range of +/- 0.5 dB. It is also evident that pass biases, i.e., differences between ascending and descending passes, exist over the Amazon rainforest for both QuikSCAT and OSCAT. This diurnal variation in sigma degrees may go up to 1.25 dB in OSCAT. Further, computations of daily average and standard deviation over the calibration site show that mean OSCAT sigma degrees is consistent with mean QuikSCAT sigma degrees, whereas the standard deviation in OSCAT is marginally higher. Further, time-series analysis of OSCAT sigma degrees shows its temporal stability.
引用
收藏
页码:3393 / 3398
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Attema E. P. W., 1991, P IEEE, V79
  • [2] THE SEASAT-A SATELLITE SCATTEROMETER - THE GEOPHYSICAL EVALUATION OF REMOTELY SENSED WIND VECTORS OVER THE OCEAN
    JONES, WL
    SCHROEDER, LC
    BOGGS, DH
    BRACALENTE, EM
    BROWN, RA
    DOME, GJ
    PIERSON, WJ
    WENTZ, FJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 1982, 87 (NC5) : 3297 - 3317
  • [3] SEASAT OVER-LAND SCATTEROMETER DATA .2. SELECTION OF EXTENDED AREA LAND-TARGET SITES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF SPACEBORNE SCATTEROMETERS
    KENNETT, RG
    LI, FK
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1989, 27 (06): : 779 - 788
  • [4] Evaluation of Oceansat-2-Derived Ocean Surface Winds Using Observations From Global Buoys and Other Scatterometers
    Kumar, Raj
    Chakraborty, Abhisek
    Parekh, Anant
    Sikhakolli, Rajesh
    Gohil, Bhawani Singh
    Kumar, A. S. Kiran
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (05): : 2571 - 2576
  • [5] Relative Calibration Using Natural Terrestrial Targets: A Preparation Towards Oceansat-2 Scatterometer
    Kumar, Raj
    Bhowmick, Suchandra Aich
    Babu, K. N.
    Nigam, Rahul
    Sarkar, Abhijit
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (06): : 2268 - 2273
  • [6] Calibrating seawinds and QuikSCAT scatterometers using natural land targets
    Kunz, LB
    Long, DG
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2005, 2 (02) : 182 - 186
  • [7] Calibration of spaceborne scatterometers using tropical rain forests
    Long, DG
    Skouson, GB
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1996, 34 (02): : 413 - 424
  • [8] Improved resolution backscatter measurements with the SeaWinds pencil-beam scatterometer
    Spencer, MW
    Wu, CL
    Long, DG
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 38 (01): : 89 - 104
  • [9] Postlaunch sensor verification and calibration of the NASA Scatterometer
    Tsai, W
    Graf, JE
    Winn, C
    Huddleston, JN
    Dunbar, S
    Freilich, MH
    Wentz, FJ
    Long, DG
    Jones, WL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (03): : 1517 - 1542
  • [10] Watt G., IEEE T GEOSCI REMOTE, V35, P1979