Effect of Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing on Population-Based Incidence Rates of Clostridium difficile Infection

被引:84
作者
Gould, Carolyn V. [1 ]
Edwards, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Cohen, Jessica [1 ]
Bamberg, Wendy M. [2 ]
Clark, Leigh Ann [3 ]
Farley, Monica M. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Johnston, Helen [2 ]
Nadle, Joelle [6 ]
Winston, Lisa [7 ]
Gerding, Dale N. [8 ,9 ]
McDonald, L. Clifford [1 ]
Lessa, Fernanda C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Healthcare Qual Promot, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
[2] Colorado Dept Hlth, Denver, CO 80220 USA
[3] Georgia Emerging Infect Program, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Emory Univ, Div Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Atlanta VA Med Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Calif Emerging Infect Program, Oakland, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Infect Dis, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[8] Hines VA Hosp, Maywood, IL USA
[9] Loyola Univ Chicago, Stritch Sch Med, Maywood, IL USA
关键词
Clostridium difficile; clinical laboratory techniques; nucleic acid amplification techniques; incidence; surveillance; REAL-TIME PCR; ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; TOXIN; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1093/cid/cit492
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is increasingly being adopted for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Data from 3 states conducting population-based CDI surveillance showed increases ranging from 43% to 67% in CDI incidence attributable to changing from toxin enzyme immunoassays to NAAT. CDI surveillance requires adjustment for testing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1304 / 1307
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Compared to Real-Time PCR and Enzyme Immunoassay for Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Detection
    Boyanton, Bobby L., Jr.
    Sural, Preethi
    Loomis, Caroline R.
    Pesta, Christine
    Gonzalez-Krellwitz, Laura
    Robinson-Dunn, Barbara
    Riska, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 50 (03) : 640 - 645
  • [2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Emerging infections program healthcare-associated infections-community interface report, Clostridioides difficile infection surveillance, 2021
  • [3] Clinical and laboratory evaluation of a real-time PCR for Clostridium difficile toxin A and B genes
    de Jong, E.
    de Jong, A. S.
    Bartels, C. J. M.
    van der Rijt-van den Biggelaar, C.
    Melchers, W. J. G.
    Sturm, P. D. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 31 (09) : 2219 - 2225
  • [4] Dudeck MA., 2013, Risk Adjustment for Healthcare Facility-Onset C. difficile and MRSA Bacteremia Laboratory-identified Event Reporting in NHSN
  • [5] Federal Register, FED REG, V76
  • [6] Public Reporting of Clostridium difficile and Improvements in Diagnostic Tests
    Goldenberg, Simon D.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (12) : 1231 - 1232
  • [7] Performance of Clostridium difficile Toxin Enzyme Immunoassay and Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests Stratified by Patient Disease Severity
    Humphries, Romney M.
    Uslan, Daniel Z.
    Rubin, Zachary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 51 (03) : 869 - 873
  • [8] Clinical impact of switching conventional enzyme immunoassay with nucleic acid amplification test for suspected Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea
    Johnson, Steven W.
    Kanatani, Meganne
    Humphries, Romney M.
    Uslan, Daniel Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2013, 41 (04) : 373 - 375
  • [9] Kandelaki G, 2011, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V32, P932, DOI [10.1086/661788, 10.1086/661789]
  • [10] Impact of the Type of Diagnostic Assay on Clostridium difficile Infection and Complication Rates in a Mandatory Reporting Program
    Longtin, Yves
    Trottier, Sylvie
    Brochu, Gilles
    Paquet-Bolduc, Bianka
    Garenc, Christophe
    Loungnarath, Vilayvong
    Beaulieu, Catherine
    Goulet, Danielle
    Longtin, Jean
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (01) : 67 - 73