Determining consensus thresholds for group decision making with preference relations

被引:20
|
作者
Wang, Hai [1 ]
Liao, Huchang [2 ]
Huang, Bing [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Informat Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Group decision-making; decision analysis; preference relations; consensus measures; consensus thresholds; CONSISTENCY MEASURES; MODEL; SEMANTICS;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2020.1779626
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Consensus thresholds play a significant role in consensus checking and reaching in group decision-making problems. The existing studies contribute very few guidelines and leave the task of determining consensus thresholds to decision makers. This paper presents an effective process to determine the thresholds in the setting of group decision-making with preference relations (PRs). The process employs a concept called random consensus indices which refer to the expected values of consensus indices of randomly generated PRs. Instead of determining the thresholds directly, decision makers are only required to express that, to what extent, the information provided by the authorized experts should be better than the random case. From the view of decision makers, the process is independent to specific consensus measures and thus could be applied easily. The process is implemented with different types of PRs and discussed in distinct situations. Besides, for the applications of frequently considered scenarios, the values of random consensus indices are provided and the consensus thresholds are recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:2290 / 2300
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations
    Zhang, Yixin
    Xu, Zeshui
    Liao, Huchang
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 414 : 260 - 275
  • [2] Optimal consensus models for group decision making under linguistic preference relations
    Xu, Yejun
    Sun, Hao
    Wang, Huimin
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 23 (06) : 1201 - 1228
  • [3] Managing consensus and self-confidence in multiplicative preference relations in group decision making
    Liu, Wenqi
    Zhang, Hengjie
    Chen, Xia
    Yu, Shui
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2018, 162 : 62 - 73
  • [4] An Interactive Consensus Model in Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Hesitant Preference Relations
    Song, Yongming
    AXIOMS, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [5] Consensus Reaching Process for Group Decision Making with Distributed Preference Relations Under Fuzzy Uncertainty
    Zhou, Mi
    Li, Jian-Lan
    Chen, Yu-Wang
    Zhou, Zhi-Ping
    Wu, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2022, 24 (05) : 2363 - 2381
  • [6] A genetic algorithm based on dual hesitant fuzzy preference relations for consensus group decision making
    Calache, Lucas Daniel Del Rosso
    Camargo, Victor Claudio Bento
    Osiro, Lauro
    Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 121
  • [7] Novel consistency and consensus of generalized intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations with application in group decision making
    Xie, Huan Tian
    Ma, Zhen Ming
    Xu, Ze Shui
    Fu, Zun Wei
    Yang, Wei
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 52 (14) : 16832 - 16851
  • [8] Group decision making based on consistency and consensus analysis of dual multiplicative linguistic preference relations
    Meng, Fanyong
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Fu, Linxian
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 572 : 590 - 610
  • [9] A consensus-based method for group decision making with incomplete uncertain linguistic preference relations
    Xu, Yejun
    Zhang, Ziqiang
    Wang, Huimin
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (02) : 669 - 682
  • [10] Improving Consensus in Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Granular Computing Approach
    Javier Cabrerizo, Francisco
    Antonio Morente-Molinera, Juan
    Alonso, Sergio
    Pedrycz, Witold
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 1471 - 1476