Comparison of Cases Captured in the National Cancer Data Base with Those in Population-based Central Cancer Registries

被引:264
作者
Lerro, Catherine C. [1 ]
Robbins, Anthony S. [2 ]
Phillips, Jerri Linn [3 ]
Stewart, Andrew K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Amer Canc Soc, Hlth Serv Res Program, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[3] Amer Coll Surg, Commiss Canc, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-013-2901-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) is a large, geographically diverse hospital-based cancer registry that has been used to study factors related to cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival. The primary purpose of this study was to compare the case counts and characteristics of patients in NCDB with population-based registries reported in the United States Cancer Statistics (USCS). Cancer case counts from NCDB were compared to case counts from USCS to measure NCDB's case coverage, or the percentage of cases captured. Case coverage was examined by a variety of characteristics, including state of residence, race/ethnicity, age, and primary cancer site. The overall NCDB case coverage was 67.4 %, ranging from a high of 88.7 % for Delaware to a low of 27.1 % for Arizona. Case coverage for white, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander cases was high (64.7 % to 67.4 %), but it was much lower for American Indians/Alaskan Natives (32.8 %) and those of Hispanic ethnicity (51.1 %). Among the elderly (aged 65 + years), case coverage is much lower compared to persons younger than 65 (63.0 % and 73.0 %, respectively). Case coverage also varied widely by site, with the highest being cervix (77.9 %) and the lowest being melanoma (50.6 %). This study highlights the geographic- and site-specific variation in NCDB case coverage, primarily as a result of NCDB facility presence and data collection and processing protocols. These findings illustrate the strengths and limitations of NCDB as a resource for nationwide data on cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1759 / 1765
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, HISPANICS IN THE UNI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, UNITED STATES CANCER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SEER CANC STAT REV 1
[4]  
Bailey L., 2004, AGING AMERICANS STRA
[5]   The National Cancer Data Base: A powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) :683-690
[6]   Comparison of Commission on Cancer-Approved and -Nonapproved Hospitals in the United States: Implications for Studies That Use the National Cancer Data Base [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (25) :4177-4181
[7]   Methods for improving cancer surveillance data in American Indian and Alaska Native populations [J].
Espey, David K. ;
Wiggins, Charles L. ;
Jim, Melissa A. ;
Miller, Barry A. ;
Johnson, Christopher J. ;
Becker, Tom M. .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (05) :1120-1130
[8]  
Havener L, 2004, STANDARDS FOR CANCER, V2
[9]  
Howe HL, 2005, EVALUATION OF NHIA S
[10]   Cancer statistics, 2005 [J].
Jemal, A ;
Murray, T ;
Ward, E ;
Samuels, A ;
Tiwari, RC ;
Ghafoor, A ;
Feuer, EJ ;
Thun, MJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2005, 55 (01) :10-30