Spinal cord stimulation in hemodialysis patients with critical lower-limb ischemia

被引:13
|
作者
Brummer, Uwe
Condini, Viviana
Cappelli, Paolo
Di Liberato, Lorenzo
Scesi, Michele
Bonomini, Mario
Costantini, Amedeo
机构
[1] Osped Clinicizzato SS Annunziata, Clin Nefrol Terapia Emodepurat, Blood Purificat Unit, Inst Nephrol, I-66013 Chieti, Italy
[2] SS Annunziata Hosp, Inst Anesthesiol, Pain Unit, I-66013 Chieti, Italy
关键词
spinal cord stimulation; peripheral arterial occlusive disease; critical lower-limb ischemia; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); quality of life; amputation;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.02.172
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been proposed for the treatment of ischemic pain and the prevention or delay of amputation in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) who are unsuitable for vascular reconstruction. PAOD is common in patients with end-stage renal disease and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, many patients are not candidates for limb-sparing procedures and have to undergo primary amputation. Methods: We report our experience with SCS in 8 hemodialysis patients with chronic lower-limb ischemia and not suitable for either primary surgical or angioplastic intervention or reintervention. Intensity of ischemic pain, quality of life, use of analgesic medications, limb survival, and outcome of skin ischemic lesions were evaluated before implantation of an SCS device and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Results No complications from SCS device implantation occurred. Both intensity of pain and quality of life significantly improved during follow-up. SCS allowed a decrease in pain medication intake in all patients. Limb survival at 1 year was 75%. Ischemic skin lesions before implantation of an SCS device did not ameliorate during the follow-up period, but the appearance of new lesions was not observed. Conclusion: Implantation of an SCS device in patients with end-stage renal disease with critical limb ischemia dramatically improves quality of life and pain relief. In patients assessed at Leriche-Fontaine stage 2 or 3, the treatment might delay the appearance of ischemic skin lesions and amputation. At these stages, presumed long-term benefits could justify the cost of SCS.
引用
收藏
页码:842 / 847
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arterial perforation during lower limb percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for treating critical lower limb ischemia
    Atta, Islam
    Zekilah, Samy
    El Abd, Amr
    Fouda, Haitham
    Sawaby, Ahmed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 40 (02) : 522 - 527
  • [42] The Protective Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation Postconditioning Against Spinal Cord Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rabbits
    Li, Huixian
    Dong, Xiuhua
    Jin, Mu
    Cheng, Weiping
    NEUROMODULATION, 2018, 21 (05): : 448 - 456
  • [43] Cryoplasty therapy for limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia
    Das, Tony
    McNamara, Thomas
    Gray, Bruce
    Sedillo, Gino J.
    Turley, Brian R.
    Kollmeyer, Kenneth
    Rogoff, Michael
    Aruny, John E.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2007, 14 (06) : 753 - 762
  • [44] Potential benefits of spinal cord stimulation treatment on quality of life for paralyzed patients with spinal cord injury
    Huang, Xiang-Ling
    Chen, Yu-Chen
    Kuo, Chang-Chih
    Tsai, Sheng-Tzung
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 35 (02): : 131 - 136
  • [45] Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
    van Heteren, Esther P. Z.
    van Roosendaal, Bert -Kristian W. P.
    van Gorp, Eric -Jan J. A. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Buerger, Katja
    Teernstra, Otto P. M.
    Buschman, Hendrik P. J.
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 26 (03): : 658 - 665
  • [46] Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome
    van Heteren, Esther P. Z.
    van Roosendaal, Bert-Kristian W. P.
    van Gorp, Eric-Jan J. A. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Kallewaard, Jan Willem
    Wegener, Jessica T.
    Burger, Katja
    Teernstra, Otto P. M.
    Buschman, Hendrik P. J.
    Hamm-Faber, Tanja E.
    Vissers, Kris C. P.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (03): : 658 - 665
  • [47] Spinal cord stimulation for non-reconstructable chronic critical leg ischaemia
    Ubbink, Dirk T.
    Vermeulen, Hester
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (02):
  • [48] Spinal, pelvic, and hip movement asymmetries in people with lower-limb amputation: Systematic review
    Devan, Hemakumar
    Carman, Allan
    Hendrick, Paul
    Hale, Leigh
    Ribeiro, Daniel Cury
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 52 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [49] Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of refractory unilateral limb pain syndromes
    Kumar, A
    Felderhof, C
    Eljamel, MS
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 81 (1-4) : 70 - 74
  • [50] Independence and mobility after infrainguinal lower limb bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia
    Ambler, Graeme K.
    Dapaah, Andrew
    Al Zuhir, Naail
    Hayes, Paul D.
    Gohel, Manjit S.
    Boyle, Jonathan R.
    Varty, Kevin
    Coughlin, Patrick A.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (04) : 983 - +