Undermining Obligation to God: Hobbes's Religious Rhetoric and False Forms of Obligation

被引:1
作者
Higgins, Nicholas [1 ]
机构
[1] Regent Univ, Govt, Virginia Beach, VA USA
关键词
Hobbes; obligation; religious rhetoric; religion; NATURAL LAW; TOLERATION; CONTEXT; BELIEF; FOOL;
D O I
10.1080/1462317X.2018.1540176
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
This paper examines Hobbes's use of religious rhetoric, specifically his definitions of the terms grace, faith, and future words in his explanation of the nature and origins of obligation. Through categorization and analysis of Hobbes's different forms of obligation, paying special attention to the religious rhetoric of the false forms, it becomes evident that Hobbes's view of obligation is designed not only to establish a political order, but to undermine man's obligation to God, and as such, remove the possibility of competing obligation in the life of the citizen, and thereby reduce the cause of civil wars.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 242
页数:19
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   PUBLICITY, PRIVACY, AND RELIGIOUS TOLERATION IN HOBBES'S LEVIATHAN [J].
Abizadeh, Arash .
MODERN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY, 2013, 10 (02) :261-291
[2]   Kingdom of God and Potentia Dei. An Interpretation of Divine Omnipotence in Hobbes's Thought [J].
Altini, Carlo .
HOBBES STUDIES, 2013, 26 (01) :65-84
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1964, The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, BRIT MORALISTS INTER
[5]  
[Anonymous], POLITICS LANGUAGE TI
[6]  
[Anonymous], The Westminster Larger Catechism
[7]  
[Anonymous], WESTMINSTER CONFESSI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ESSAY HUMAN UNDERSTA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HOBBESS CRITIQUE REL
[10]  
Aquinas Thomas., 2006, Summa Theologiae, Questions on God