Quantitative Residue-Level Structure-Evolution Relationships in the Yeast Membrane Proteome

被引:9
作者
Franzosa, Eric A. [1 ]
Xue, Ran [1 ]
Xia, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Bioinformat Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Dept Chem, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Boston Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
GENOME BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2013年 / 5卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
membrane protein; protein structure; solvent accessibility; dN; dS; S; cerevisiae; AMINO-ACID-COMPOSITION; SOLVENT ACCESSIBILITY; COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; PROTEINS; PREDICTION; PACKING; DETERMINANTS; CONSTRAINTS; PRESSURES; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/gbe/evt039
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Membrane proteins exist in distinctly different environments than do soluble proteins, resulting in differences between their respective biophysical and evolutionary properties. In comparison with soluble proteins, relatively little is known about how the unique biophysical properties of membrane proteins affect their evolutionary properties at the residue level. In particular, transmembrane (TM) regions of membrane proteins tend to be more conserved than regions outside of the membrane (extramembrane [EM] regions), but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not well understood. Here, we combine homology-based high-resolution three-dimensional protein models with rigorous evolutionary rate calculations to quantitatively assess residue-level structure-evolution relationships in the yeast membrane proteome. We find that residue evolutionary rate increases linearly with decreasing residue burial, regardless of the hydrophobic or hydrophilic nature of the solvent environment. This finding supports a direct relationship between a residue's selective constraint and the extent of its packing interactions with neighboring residues, independent of hydrophobic effects. Most importantly, for a fixed degree of burial, residues from TM regions tend to evolve more slowly than residues from EM regions. We attribute this difference to the increased importance of packing constraints and the decreased importance of hydrophobic effects in TM regions. This additional selective constraint on TM residues plays a dominant role in explaining why TM regions evolve more slowly than EM regions. In addition to revealing the universality of the linear relationship between residue burial and selective constraint across solvent environments, our work highlights the distinct residue-level evolutionary consequences imposed by the unique biophysical properties of the membrane environment.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 744
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Helix-helix packing and interfacial pairwise interactions of residues in membrane proteins [J].
Adamian, L ;
Liang, J .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 311 (04) :891-907
[2]   Lipid-binding surfaces of membrane proteins: Evidence from evolutionary and structural analysis [J].
Adamian, Larisa ;
Naveed, Hammad ;
Liang, Jie .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES, 2011, 1808 (04) :1092-1102
[3]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[4]   Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [J].
Babu, Mohan ;
Vlasblom, James ;
Pu, Shuye ;
Guo, Xinghua ;
Graham, Chris ;
Bean, Bjoern D. M. ;
Burston, Helen E. ;
Vizeacoumar, Franco J. ;
Snider, Jamie ;
Phanse, Sadhna ;
Fong, Vincent ;
Tam, Yuen Yi C. ;
Davey, Michael ;
Hnatshak, Olha ;
Bajaj, Navgeet ;
Chandran, Shamanta ;
Punna, Thanuja ;
Christopolous, Constantine ;
Wong, Victoria ;
Yu, Analyn ;
Zhong, Gouqing ;
Li, Joyce ;
Stagljar, Igor ;
Conibear, Elizabeth ;
Wodak, Shoshana J. ;
Emili, Andrew ;
Greenblatt, Jack F. .
NATURE, 2012, 489 (7417) :585-+
[5]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[6]   Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast [J].
Bloom, Jesse D. ;
Drummond, D. Allan ;
Arnold, Frances H. ;
Wilke, Claus O. .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2006, 23 (09) :1751-1761
[7]   Solving the membrane protein folding problem [J].
Bowie, JU .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7068) :581-589
[8]   Solvent accessibility and purifying selection within proteins of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica [J].
Bustamante, CD ;
Townsend, JP ;
Hartl, DL .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 17 (02) :301-308
[9]   SGD:: Saccharomyces Genome Database [J].
Cherry, JM ;
Adler, C ;
Ball, C ;
Chervitz, SA ;
Dwight, SS ;
Hester, ET ;
Jia, YK ;
Juvik, G ;
Roe, T ;
Schroeder, M ;
Weng, SA ;
Botstein, D .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1998, 26 (01) :73-79
[10]   Systematically assessing the influence of 3-dimensional structural context on the molecular evolution of mammalian proteomes [J].
Choi, Sun Shim ;
Vallender, Eric J. ;
Lahn, Bruce T. .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2006, 23 (11) :2131-2133