Control with endophytic bacteria and in vitro inhibition of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, agent of bacterial speck of tomato

被引:10
作者
Campos Silva, Juliana Resende [1 ]
de Souza, Ricardo Magela [2 ]
Zacarone, Ana Beatriz [3 ]
Pereira da Silva, Luis Henrique Carregal [1 ]
dos Santos Castro, Ana Maria [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rio Verde FESURV Fazenda Fontes Saber, Dept Agron Fitopatol, BR-75901970 Rio Verde, Go, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Lavras UFLA, Dept Fitopatol, BR-37200000 Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Lavras UFLA, Dept Engn DEG, BR-37200000 Lavras, MG, Brazil
来源
CIENCIA E AGROTECNOLOGIA | 2008年 / 32卷 / 04期
关键词
endophytic bacteria; biological control; bacterial speck; tomato;
D O I
10.1590/S1413-70542008000400005
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To asses the potential of fifty three isolates of endophytic bacteria on the control of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) in tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.), several screening were done in greenhouse followed by in vitro studies on antagonism of those isolates to Pst. The inoculation of endophytic bacteria was done by microbiolization of tomato cv Santa Clara seeds. The challenging bacterium (Pst) inoculation was done by spraying. At 7, 14 and 2 1 days after Pst inoculation the assessment of bacterial speck severity was done, and height of plants was also measured. The most efficient endophytic species and isolates in reducing disease severity were: Acinetobacter johnsonii (isolate 10). Bacillus pumilus (isolates, 3. 12, 20 39. 5 1). Paenibacillus macerans (isolates, 37, 47). PIM 11, Bacillus sphaericus (isolate 45), B. amyloliquefaciens (isolate 50). TOM 2. TOM 24 and Staphylococcus aureus (isolate 18). More than 50% of the endophytic isolates efficient in reducing disease severity belonged to Bacillus pumilus. From the most efficient endophytic species group, the species Bacillus pumilus and B. amyloliquefaciens inhibited the Pst growth in vitro. Several bacterial isolates promoted growth of tomato.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1072
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COMPENDIUM TOMATO DI
[2]  
Assis Sayonara M. P., 1998, Summa Phytopathologica, V24, P216
[3]  
CARRER R, 2002, FITOPATOLOGIA BRASIL, V27, P222
[4]   COMPARISON OF BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL TREATMENTS FOR CONTROL OF BACTERIAL SPECK OF TOMATO UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS IN MOROCCO [J].
COLIN, JE ;
CHAFIK, Z .
PLANT DISEASE, 1986, 70 (11) :1048-1050
[5]   Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria [J].
Guo, JH ;
Qi, HY ;
Guo, YH ;
Ge, HL ;
Gong, LY ;
Zhang, LX ;
Sun, PH .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2004, 29 (01) :66-72
[6]  
Guo JianHua, 1996, Acta Phytopathologica Sinica, V26, P49
[7]   Canonical formulation of nonholonomic constrained systems [J].
Guo, YX ;
Yu, Y ;
Huang, HJ .
CHINESE PHYSICS, 2001, 10 (01) :1-6
[8]  
HALFELDVIEIRA BA, 2001, FITOPATOLOGIA BRASIL, V26, P488
[9]   SELECTIVE MEDIA FOR ISOLATION OF AGROBACTERIUM, CORYNEBACTERIUM, ERWINIA, PSEUDOMONAS, AND XANTHOMONAS [J].
KADO, CI ;
HESKETT, MG .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1970, 60 (06) :969-+
[10]  
Kimura O., 1996, Informe Agropecuario (Belo Horizonte), V18, P66