The value of bulk energy storage for reducing CO2 emissions and water requirements from regional electricity systems

被引:26
作者
Ogland-Hand, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Bielicki, Jeffrey M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yaoping [1 ]
Adams, Benjamin M. [4 ]
Buscheck, Thomas A. [5 ]
Saar, Martin O. [4 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Environm Sci Grad Program, 174 West 18th, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Civil Environm & Geodet Engn, 2070 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, John Glenn Coll Publ Affairs, 1810 Coll Rd, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Earth Sci, Geothermal Energy & Geofluids Grp, Sonneggstr 5, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Lawrence Livermore Natl Lab, Phys & Life Sci Directorate, Atmospher Earth & Energy Div, Livermore, CA 94550 USA
[6] Univ Minnesota, Dept Earth Sci, 116 Church St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bulk energy storage; Dispatch; Electricity system; Decarbonization; Water-energy nexus; Integrated assessment modeling; POWER-PLANTS; SHIFT; CPG;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.019
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The implementation of bulk energy storage (BES) technologies can help to achieve higher penetration and utilization of variable renewable energy technologies (e.g., wind and solar), but it can also alter the dispatch order in regional electricity systems in other ways. These changes to the dispatch order affect the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) that is emitted to the atmosphere and the amount of total water that is required by the electricity generating facilities. In a case study of the Electricity Reliability Council of Texas system, we separately investigated the value that three BES technologies (CO2-Geothermal Bulk Energy Storage, Compressed Air Energy Storage, Pumped Hydro Energy Storage) could have for reducing system-wide CO2 emissions and water requirements. In addition to increasing the utilization of wind power capacity, the dispatch of BES also led to an increase in the utilization of natural gas power capacity and of coal power capacity, and a decrease in the utilization of nuclear power capacity, depending on the character of the net load, the CO2 price, the water price, and the BES technology. These changes to the dispatch order provided positive value (e.g., increase in natural gas generally reduced CO2 emissions; decrease in nuclear utilization always decreased water requirements) or negative value (e.g., increase in coal sometimes increased CO2 emissions; increase in natural gas sometimes increased water requirements) to the regional electricity system. We also found that these values to the system can be greater than the cost of operating the BES facility. At present, there are mechanisms to compensate BES facilities for ancillary grid services, and our results suggest that similar mechanisms could be enacted to compensate BES facilities for their contribution to the environmental sustainability of the system.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 685
页数:12
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   A comparison of electric power output of CO2 Plume Geothermal (CPG) and brine geothermal systems for varying reservoir conditions [J].
Adams, Benjamin M. ;
Kuehn, Thomas H. ;
Bielicki, Jeffrey M. ;
Randolph, Jimmy B. ;
Saar, Martin O. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 140 :365-377
[2]   On the importance of the thermosiphon effect in CPG (CO2 plume geothermal) power systems [J].
Adams, Benjamin M. ;
Kuehn, Thomas H. ;
Bielicki, Jeffrey M. ;
Randolph, Jimmy B. ;
Saar, Martin O. .
ENERGY, 2014, 69 :409-418
[3]  
Akhil A.A., 2015, DOE / EPRI Electricity Storage Handbook in Collaboration with NRECA
[4]  
Allen P.A. Allen., 2013, Basin Analysis: Principles and Application to Petroleum Play Assessment, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.208.4442.393
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CAL CARB DASHB 2017
[6]  
[Anonymous], TOD EN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, COST PERF DAT POW GE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LEV COST EN AN VERS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Levelized Cost of Storage - Verson 2.0, DOI DOI 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685626
[10]  
[Anonymous], LAZ LEV COST STOR AN