Validating the Volleyball Common Content Knowledge Test

被引:4
作者
Tsuda, Emi [1 ]
Ward, Phillip [2 ]
Sazama, Debra [3 ]
He, Yaohui [4 ]
Lehwald, Harry [2 ]
Ko, Bomna [5 ]
Santiago, Jose A. [6 ]
Xie, Xiuye [7 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Sch Sport Sci, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Human Sci, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin La Crosse, Exercise & Sport Sci Dept, La Crosse, WI USA
[4] East China Normal Univ, Coll Phys Educ & Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] East Carolina Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Greenville, NC USA
[6] Sam Houston State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Huntsville, TX USA
[7] Missouri State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Springfield, MO USA
来源
PHYSICAL EDUCATOR-US | 2022年 / 79卷 / 05期
关键词
HEALTH-RELATED FITNESS;
D O I
10.18666/TPE-2022-V79-I5-10958
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to create a valid and reliable volley-ball common content knowledge (VB-CCK) test in secondary physical education contexts in the United States. Two physical education teacher educators served as content experts and developed test items for the VB-CCK test. We then established content validity with a group of in-service teachers and determined face validity with preservice teachers. The Rasch model was used in data analysis. The standardized residual contrasts for the items loaded in the range of-.4 to .4, confirming the test was unidimensional and measured VB-CCK. Both infit mean-square residuals and outfit mean-square residuals were within the criterion range of .5 to 1.5 (infit = .8 to 1.1; outfit = .8 to 1.5), which showed the range of the question difficulties matched the respondents' knowledge levels. The item separation index was 3.46 (reliability = .92; an excellent level) and the person separation index was 1.55 (reliability = .71; an acceptable level). The results provided evidence of the range of question difficulties and respondents' knowledge levels. The Wright Map added additional evidence that the 40 questions were well distributed from easy to difficult levels and could discriminate different knowledge levels of preservice teachers' VB-CCK. The study was successful in developing a valid and reliable instrument for PETE programs to assess secondary VB-CCK of their preservice teachers. We propose future CCK studies for both elementary content and secondary content.
引用
收藏
页码:569 / 585
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
[21]  
Santiago JA, 2012, PHYS EDUC-US, V69, P395
[22]  
SHAPE America, 2014, National standards grade-level outcomes for K-12 physical education
[23]  
Tsuda E., 2019, INT J SPORT HLTH SCI, V17, P178, DOI DOI 10.5432/IJSHS.201916
[24]   The tennis common content knowledge measure validation [J].
Tsuda, Emi ;
Ward, Phillip ;
Kim, Junyoung ;
He, Yaohui ;
Sazama, Debra ;
Brian, Ali .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL EDUCATION REVIEW, 2021, 27 (03) :654-665
[25]   Content Knowledge Acquisition in Physical Education: Evidence From Knowing and Performing by Majors and Nonmajors [J].
Tsuda, Emi ;
Ward, Phillip ;
Li, Yilin ;
Higginson, Kelsey ;
Cho, Kyuil ;
He, Yaohui ;
Su, Jianzhen .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 38 (03) :221-232
[26]  
Viera B., 1989, TEACHING VOLLEYBALL
[27]  
Ward P., 2018, Effective physical education content and instruction
[28]  
Ward P., 2009, Content matters: Knowledge that alters teaching. historic traditions and future directions of research on teaching and teacher education in physical education, P345
[29]   Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptions and Findings in Physical Education [J].
Ward, Phillip ;
Ayvazo, Shiri .
JOURNAL OF TEACHING IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 35 (03) :194-207