Using Electronic Health Record-Based Tools To Screen for Bipolar Disorder in Primary Care Patients With Depression

被引:27
作者
Gill, James M. [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Ying Xia [1 ]
Grimes, Angela [1 ]
Klinkman, Michael S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Delaware Valley Outcomes Res, Newark, DE USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Family & Community Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Family Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Bipolar Disorder; Depression; Electronic Health Record; Mental Health; Primary Health Care; Quality of Health Care; COMPETING DEMANDS; DECISION-SUPPORT; LIPID MANAGEMENT; OUTPATIENT CARE; EHR NETWORK; REMINDERS; QUALITY; PHYSICIANS; PROJECT;
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.2012.03.110217
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: National guidelines recommend screening all persons with depression for bipolar disorder (BPD); one way to facilitate screening is through the use of electronic health records (EHRs). This study examined the impact of an EHR-based screening and decision support tool on diagnosis and treatment of BPD among patients diagnosed with depression in primary care offices. Methods: This nonrandomized, controlled trial was conducted in a national network of offices using EHRs. The intervention included a screening instrument and other tools for diagnosis and management of BPD, which were embedded into the EHR. This instrument automatically activated when a patient with a diagnosis of depression but no diagnosis of BPD was seen in the office. The primary outcomes were the rates of new diagnoses of BPD and prescription of new BPD medications during the 6-month study period (April to October 2009). Results: Twenty-one offices with 75 clinicians and 8355 adult patients with depression composed the intervention group, whereas 17 offices with 81 clinicians and 8799 adult patients with depression served as the comparison group. The screening tool was used with 47.5% of intervention patients, of whom 2.5% scored at high or very high risk for BPD. Intervention patients were more likely than comparison patients to be newly diagnosed with BPD (1.11% vs. 0.36%; P < .01) and be prescribed new BPD medications (1.85% vs. 1.19%; P < .01). Conclusions: The study suggests that EHR-based tools can be useful for screening and management of BPD for patients with depression in primary care offices. (J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:283-290.)
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 290
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAM PRACT S1, V56, pS5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAM PRACT S1, V56, pS28
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAM PRACT S1, V56, pS3
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAM PRACT S1, V56, pS11
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J FAM PRACT S1, V56, pS19
[6]  
Chambers C V, 1991, J Am Board Fam Pract, V4, P19
[7]  
CHAMBERS CV, 1989, J FAM PRACTICE, V29, P273
[8]   Chronic depression in bipolar disorder [J].
El-Mallakh, Rif S. ;
Karippot, Anoop .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 163 (08) :1337-1341
[9]   Managing patients with depression: Is primary care up to the challenge? [J].
Ford, DE .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (05) :344-345
[10]   Diagnosing bipolar disorder and the effect of antidepressants: A naturalistic study [J].
Ghaemi, SN ;
Boiman, EE ;
Goodwin, FK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 61 (10) :804-808